That is a very good point, even if offered in jest. It does appear the leftists continue to advance the fraud with this latest memo.
However, it is also clear the entire Republican political machine gave Obama a pass at every point in the process during 2008-09. At the local level, even Republican SoS’s either were induced to look the other way for political purposes, or believed the foreign father disqualification to be a federal issue. Unfortunately, resolution of the issue will most likely involve a lengthy and expensive federal lawsuit, and the outcome is uncertain.
As seen elsewhere on FR, NH to its credit and perhaps after analyzing the 2008-09 fiasco, added in 2010 two important elements to its primary election laws. NH now requires a presidential candidate to swear under oath that he or she is a NBC.
So one can ask:
What should NH (or any other state) do with a candidate who has on numerous occasions successfully refused to submit a BC to a court of law for examination, but has released to the public patently fabricated birth documents as proof of birthplace?
Shouldn’t those facts raise a reasonable question as to the validity of a declaration regarding place of birth sworn by that candidate?
Wouldn’t it be reasonable for the state to request that the candidate authorize the state of birth to provide it with copies of birth documents together with certification that those documents establish the actual birthplace?
Wouldn’t such a transaction be a sensible, quick and inexpensive means of resolving questions re the validity of the candidate’s declaration, at least as to the first of the two elements of NBC?
The specific question for NH legislators: “What was your intent with the 2010 legislation if it was not to enforce it?
Oooops, a Mae West.