Posted on 11/11/2011 9:49:00 PM PST by TitansAFC
When I saw Herman Cain’s interview with Wolf Blitzer yesterday afternoon, this immediately jumped out at me:
.........
(Excerpt) Read more at outsidethebeltway.com ...
Take the time to read,
that is how the article starts.
Gallup: Cain 18, Gingrich 15, Romney 15.
Marist: Romney 23, Gingrich 19, Cain 17.
I do recommend Cain supporters ignore discussion of what Cain says. It can’t be good for them.
Hahahaha!!!!
Thank you for clarifying.
Cain supporters = a “them”.
So who do you support? Speak up.
What was your guy Rick Perry doing in 1993?
Well how about that. Rick Perry was 1 of the very few Republicans to campaign FOR Hillary care
Wow, I didn’t know Cain had said that THIS AFTERNOON.
Zot, anyone.
And conveniently 5 anti-Cain posters were immediately available to comment on this old and debunked smear attempt. I think a GANG ZOT might be in order.
More freepers who can’t stay on-topic. It’s not really hard. Read the article posted, and comment on it. Defend your candidate’s statements.
No. Charles. It’s a game to the titan. It’s a dishonest game. And he has already played it once tonight.
Or whine.
One of those. You seem to fall into the “whine” camp.
Actually, when I heard Mitt throw this accusation at him..it took me back a little bit.
So I did a little bit of research.
When Hillarycare was working it’s way thru the channels of Congress...it was a Democratic Congress. I think Newt tried to minimize what could be. Hillarycare didn’t happen He didn’t vote for it.
When he became Speaker and we had control of the House and Senate, Hillarycare was voted down.
Gingrich was once mighty.
He could have changed history.
He may again. As Cain’s VP.
oh, I read it. And I read the article that it was linked from as well. And that only amplifies your dishonesty.
“And conveniently 5 anti-Cain posters were immediately available to comment on this old and debunked smear attempt. I think a GANG ZOT might be in order. “
That would be sweet. I thought about pinging JR regarding this abuse of his site, but he’s too busy in fund-raising mode. I guess this is what the Perry people are left with - recycling stuff from months ago and disguising it as new.
Videos of Newt on healthcare, NBC Meet The Press. This is what he truely said, not some Newsmax crap.
http://nation.foxnews.com/newt-gingrich/2011/05/15/newt-shocks-conservatives
I didn't MAKE Cain say what he said about the 2nd amendment. Someone posted a quote from Cain, and I took issue with it. You are going out of your way to ignore Cain's statement, and to avoid discussing it, going so far as to attack freepers, threaten bannings, and trying to hijack the thread with totally unrelated article links.
Of course, I've had trouble taking your posts seriously since the time you insisted that Rick Perry painted racists words ON the rock, and when people tried to explain your mistake, you called them liars.
But here we are discussing an interview Cain gave back in June where he expressed his opinion about how the 2nd amendment would apply.
you would think taking a quote out of context and spinning it to say wanted you wanted it to say was honest
My actual comment about a quote was about the quote a CAIN SUPPORTER posted to "clarify" the quotes in the main article. So if you don't like it, go yell at the Cain supporter who psoted it.
I did, post 32. Now it's your turn. Are Scalia, Thomas and Alito wrong? Do the States really not have the Authority to put reasonable restrictions on firearms? So which is it? Do you side with Cain and SCOTUS or are you on some other side.
An article from June?
A comment later clarified?
Really?
This is what the anti Cain crowd is down to?
Well you pitch the balls you got...
Gun control is a steady hand and hitting what your aiming at!
Ok, I see don’t bother you with the facts. Very well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.