Skip to comments.
Sources: Iran Already Has Nuclear Arms
Pundit Press ^
| 11/6/2011
| Thomas Ferdousi
Posted on 11/06/2011 1:25:39 PM PST by therightliveswithus
Some pretty distressing news is hitting the airwaves. Tensions have continued to rise due to Iran's nuclear program. Leaked information has indicated that Israel is considering a strike on Iran, and so is the United States and United Kingdom.
For all of this news, some could be disinformation meant to confuse the Iranian clerics. However, there may be some grains of truth to the idea that Iran is nearing a nuclear weapon.
However, there is even worse information coming from multiple sources. Unfortunately, according to both Israeli and Iranian defection sources, the Islamic Republic may already have nuclear arms. Both rumors surround supposed purchases that Tehran made in the aftermath of the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union.
One source is the Israeli site DebkaFile. Debka file correctly predicted Syria's second nuclear reactor last week-- which was later picked up by American sources.
(Excerpt) Read more at punditpress.com ...
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: iran; nukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Real? Disinformation?
To: therightliveswithus
I say we take off and nuke them from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.
2
posted on
11/06/2011 1:26:37 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(I won't vote for Romney. I won't vote for Perry.)
To: therightliveswithus
How can you hug MadMo’ with nukular arms?
3
posted on
11/06/2011 1:30:36 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: therightliveswithus
So if they do have arms the GOP need to start making those ads with Barry wanting to negotiate and Brry doing nothing while the clerics gunned down their own people.
To: therightliveswithus
Like I said, Iran isn't a threat!
5
posted on
11/06/2011 1:40:52 PM PST
by
TSgt
(whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive...it is the Right of the People to abolish it.)
To: therightliveswithus
>Leaked information has indicated that Israel is considering a strike on Iran, and so is the United States and United Kingdom.<
.
The three nations are considering strikes against Islam and yet they are consumed by the ROP, internally.
They’d better make serious provisions to pacify their own muslim population before going on the offensive.
Protecting themselves against internal terrorism will probably cost more than actually attacking Iran.
6
posted on
11/06/2011 1:45:43 PM PST
by
353FMG
(Liberalism is Satan's handiwork.)
To: therightliveswithus
Goody $20 a gallon oil is really going to help us in the USA and the global economy. I don’t believe anything anymore. The world is built on misinformation that others use to profit and then run their own back door agendas.
Make a market moving statement or action but bet big (long or short) beforehand. The message and system is controlled.
The way countries (including the USA) are invading sovereign nations at whim, if I was a 2 bit dictator I’d be knocking on doors and contacting some bankers and the Russian mafia and re-mortgaging my palace to get a few nukes. Gaddafi committed to give up his nuke ambitions so we went in and took him out. Big mistake on his part. A few nukes seems to be the only way to keep others at bay. The only countries that aren’t attacked are the ones with nukes.
Think about it.
7
posted on
11/06/2011 1:45:46 PM PST
by
apoliticalone
(Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
To: therightliveswithus
8
posted on
11/06/2011 1:46:08 PM PST
by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
To: therightliveswithus
Iran's Nukes: Apocalypse Soon? IBD Editorials ^ | June 8, 2011 | Staff
"
Terror: Iran is speeding up its nuclear materials production and moving it underground amid reports that the regime is eight weeks from atomic bomb capability. Doomsday, anyone?"
9
posted on
11/06/2011 1:47:51 PM PST
by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
To: apoliticalone
Sad but true. You can bet that many countries understand the message that’s been sent.
10
posted on
11/06/2011 1:54:35 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(I won't vote for Romney. I won't vote for Perry.)
To: therightliveswithus
So the t-shirts didn't work?

Do we have a back-up plan?
11
posted on
11/06/2011 1:55:42 PM PST
by
x
To: x
Plan B is to Occupy Wall Street. This plan is currently in effect, but I don’t think it’s going to help.
12
posted on
11/06/2011 1:57:25 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(I won't vote for Romney. I won't vote for Perry.)
To: apoliticalone
"
Goody $20 a gallon oil is really going to help us in the USA and the global economy."
U.S. Energy Information Administration "
How dependent are we on foreign oil?
The United States imported about 49% of the petroleum,1 which includes crude oil and refined petroleum products, that we consumed during 2010. About half of these imports came from the Western Hemisphere. Our dependence on foreign petroleum has declined since peaking in 2005."
But on the other hand, seeing the anti-defense comments, maybe we shouldn't bother with Iran. We'd only be allowing the loss of millions of big city lefties and the end of big government. No loss, really, and we rural conservatives are prepared.
BTW, the crazy mullahs have probably only been harping against Israel so much to distract the folks in London, New York City, San Francisco, other cites, the Vatican, and the like, until they attack with their nukes (and missiles, re-developed from Russian and Chinese hardware by Iranian, North Korean, Pakistani engineers, all).
See
comment #8.
Have fun. Enjoy the slide. We'll see much smaller government in the near future. Don't buy anything that you don't need, and become more personally independent with energy, food, etc.
13
posted on
11/06/2011 2:00:01 PM PST
by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
To: ClearCase_guy
14
posted on
11/06/2011 2:02:04 PM PST
by
EEGator
To: therightliveswithus
I have already survived radiation clouds living in the Far East when Russia and China were detonating the H-Bombs. Since I live in flyover country, I don't expect to be a target and safe from the Islamic blasts that are coming. My fear is the diverse and Obamadamas population with their civil unrest.
To: apoliticalone
"
Goody $20 a gallon oil is really going to help us in the USA and the global economy."
U.S. Energy Information Administration "
How dependent are we on foreign oil?
The United States imported about 49% of the petroleum,1 which includes crude oil and refined petroleum products, that we consumed during 2010. About half of these imports came from the Western Hemisphere. Our dependence on foreign petroleum has declined since peaking in 2005."
But on the other hand, seeing the anti-defense comments, maybe we shouldn't bother with Iran. We'd only be allowing the loss of millions of big city lefties and the end of big government. No loss, really, and we rural conservatives are prepared.
BTW, the crazy mullahs have probably only been harping against Israel so much to distract the folks in London, New York City, San Francisco, other cites, the Vatican, and the like, until they attack with their nukes (and missiles, re-developed from Russian and Chinese hardware by Iranian, North Korean, Pakistani engineers, all).
See
comment #8.
Have fun. Enjoy the slide. We'll see much smaller government in the near future. Don't buy anything that you don't need, and become more personally independent with energy, food, etc.
16
posted on
11/06/2011 2:10:27 PM PST
by
familyop
("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
To: therightliveswithus
Does anybody remember this following little factoid? In 2007, a very well 'leaked' National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) stated that Iran stopped its nuclear bomb development in 2003 and had not restarted it. This comprehensive study of Iran's nuclear efforts was front page news well into the 2008 election cycle and frequently cited as proof that the Bush'43 Administration was going overboard in its concerns and efforts to stop Iran.
Here is a quote from the "Newspaper of Record" for the Media, the New York Times; But the new estimate declares with high confidence that a military-run Iranian program intended to transform that raw material into a nuclear weapon has been shut down since 2003, and also says with high confidence that the halt was directed primarily in response to increasing international scrutiny and pressure.
I have never heard of people apologizing or being fired for this screaming error, but of course this is the Obama Administration now and one can wonder about the "running dogs lackey" status of the writers of such "NIE LIES!"
17
posted on
11/06/2011 2:25:06 PM PST
by
SES1066
(Vote in 2012 for OUR CIVIL RIGHTS not the Left's!)
To: therightliveswithus
Not a real expert here, But I believe nuclear devices dating back to 1991 (at least) would have needed skilled maintenance along the way and may have deteriorated to the point of unreliability after 20 years on the shelf.
To: therightliveswithus
No matter what this article says, Debka is not a reliable source. That said, it's almost a given Iran is at the precipice of having a nuclear weapon. Between their cooperation with the Norks and idiotic plans like Operation Merlin, they've got the recipe, though maybe not all the proper ingredients.
19
posted on
11/06/2011 2:48:07 PM PST
by
edpc
(My silence IS an answer)
Do You Really Want To Be Alone In Times Like These?
Click The Pic
Support Your Lifeline
20
posted on
11/06/2011 3:18:39 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson