The students are citizens. And this has nothing to do with health insurance, which in any case their parents would have had to pay for and therefore there’d be no reason they shouldn’t be covered by it.
Would you like to keep on the point of my argument?
Please?
Or do you not care about the rules of the in-state tuition in this state, or any other?
Did those rules in this case not state that the parents had to provide proof of citizenship?
If we can agree that is a fact, then dependency is the key component of this argument.
Then if you really want to get into the details on a broader scale, then lets go back to the original intent and focus (key word here) of the 14th amendment. This one is real easy, no reading required, just listen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EX37aeoyr4