Posted on 10/11/2011 1:45:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Link only: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/11/2012-gop-candidates-occupy-wall-street_n_1005588.html
I notice that now AOL front page news links all go to Huffington Post.
Sounds like the upper 1% is getting there just rewards since they and thiere media elected Obama. This will make them think twice.
Dude, don’t believe the Huff Post. :)
That article mentions Cain, Huntsman and Romney. Huffer Puffer is trying to equate all politicians, especially trying to make Republicans look like they FOLLOW Hussein.
I haven’t even read the article yet, my bet is Paul possibly Collins ans Snowe. Who am I forgetting?
You’re way off: Cain, Huntsman, Romney, Roehmer, etc...
LIE. Cain referred to them as lazy. He said if they fail it's their own fault. He squashed them like a bug.
Herman Cain, who initially told Americans taking to the streets to protest income inequality and joblessness that they had no one to blame but themselves, later changed his tune, arguing that the protesters should instead blame the Obama administration for the high unemployment rate.
I don't really see that as endorsing the OWS movement.
Let’s hope so!
BS
BTW, there seems to be a groundswell of support for these idiots from people I call "The New Age Economists". These are people who are ostensibly Austrian economists, but, since they hate the current system, are willing to say nice things about the Communists infecting Wall Street, etc. They also tend to be pretty fringey. You know, Alex Jones types.
I'd like to call out Max Keiser immediately. He's a buffoon and a fraud, but I know that a lot of over-heated types follow him.
Any other nominees?
Here is a direct quote of the reference to Cain:
...Republican presidential candidates who were once hostile toward the movement have begun speaking more positively about it.
Herman Cain, who initially told Americans taking to the streets to protest income inequality and joblessness that they had no one to blame but themselves, later changed his tune, arguing that the protesters should instead blame the Obama administration for the high unemployment rate.
The article then goes on to mention Huntsman and Romney.
My point was that the HuffPost is trying to paint much of the Republican field with a broad brush. In many cases, Huff and the rest of the liberal media try to make it appear as though the Republicans are agreeing with Hussein, even though that is NOT THE CASE.
For instance, I am certain in the coming weeks we will hear how Rick Perry does not agree with Hussein when it comes to illegal immigration. And we will hear how Mitt Romney doesn't agree with Hussein when it comes to health care.
At any rate, I am not a liar. And that is the truth.
see post 15.
They soooo want their freak show to be seen as main stream. It's never going to happen. There is no "main stream" about it. It's just another left wing filth fest for Oboma.
No. Of course not. I was referring to the huffinton puffington post. Cain never backed the Marxists parade.
okay. thanks. :)
I agree with you. His first statement was red meat for conservatives but was off the message and off the mark for reality.
His new message is the right one, the one every one of our candidates should be shouting — that it is the Obama administration that has made it nearly impossible for young people, and old, alike to get jobs right now, and we need new leadership who will get government out of the way so business can start creating jobs again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.