Replies

Let me get this straight.
Cain says he cannot support Perry because he hold the same positions?

No, because they do not hold the same positions on a number of key issues beginning with illegal immigrants. Did you watch the clip?

Perry and Cain do not hold the same stance on immigration. Not even close.

Sorry, but Cain’s stance on borders alone completely sets him apart.

His stance is fourfold, not threefold:
1. Secure the Border
2. Enforce the laws already on the books (including deportation)
3. Encourage the path to citizenship already in place. That is not amnesty. The path to citizenship requires that they first come legally.
4. Empower the states to do what the Federal government cannot do.

SECURE THE BORDER:

Herman Cain’s border control stance is one of the strongest out there. It is a PHYSICAL border, technological and people.
http://www.marissalynn.com/2011/09/herman-cain-on-border-have-you-ever.html

Cain’s “promote the path to citizenship” is not amnesty. He has defined it in my speeches to mean immigrants must first come here the right way.

Empowering the states to do what they have to do. Case in point, Arizona - http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/05/21/20110521presidential-election-herman-cain-tea-party-ON.html#ixzz1N3xOwayJ
_____________________

Entitlements for illegals. Look what Herman Cain wrote in 2006 on this issue: Illegal Entitlement Is Not An Option - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2784985/posts