Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

No, because anyone can have a person make a movie and only point out the good things while leaving out the non positive things. I am also not going to pay for a political commercial.

That movie is the past, remote from what is going on now.

I am very familiar with her whole record. Sarah has some good qualities, but she appears to be unsure of her plans.

She is as good as the rest, but I will call her The Unproven, because she has yet to jump in and convince me to vote for her. Not participating in the debates and speaking from the safety of the sidelines is not convincing.

I already know that Perry is not a person I would vote for. So the debates are important.

I don’t care about the past except when it concerns policy, I care about what a person will do from here forward.


216 posted on 09/25/2011 3:44:22 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: indylindy; Windflier
I don’t care about the past except when it concerns policy, I care about what a person will do from here forward.

Except their past will tell you if you're being lied to. If someone claims they'll clean up DC, have they done anything like that before or been buds with the elites? The past IS important. It tells you connections and where their allegiance is.

231 posted on 09/25/2011 4:23:58 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

To: indylindy
Sarah has some good qualities, but she appears to be unsure of her plans.

Because she hasn't called you and told you personally?


232 posted on 09/25/2011 4:24:47 PM PDT by Niteflyr ("The number one goal in life is to parent yourself" Carl Jung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

To: indylindy
No, because anyone can have a person make a movie and only point out the good things while leaving out the non positive things. I am also not going to pay for a political commercial.

Indy, your strong and unrelenting bias against Governor Palin comes through in nearly everything you post about her, but especially in that comment.

Sarah Palin didn't "have" that movie made about her. It was Stephen Bannon's idea, and he paid for it with his own money. She wasn't interviewed for it, and had no say so in the content. She was simply the subject, just as she was for Joe McGinnis' book.

The fact that you refuse to see the movie (which I can remember you panning, even while it was first hitting the movie screens), tells me that you've got fixed considerations about Palin, and that you're not going to listen to anything that conflicts with your view of her.

I'll bet you also haven't read either of her two books, or watched any of her speeches on video. Have you even bothered to read the transcripts of those speeches, or perhaps one or two of her many articles? I'll bet you haven't.

So, what good is your input here? I may as well be talking to my progressive, Obama voting brother about Palin. He's got about as much direct information about her as you have, and has pretty much the same opinions about her as you do.

249 posted on 09/25/2011 4:50:59 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson