There were people here jumping on an earlier article about this trying to insinuate that Gov. Palin must be a socialist if Ralph Nader said anything positive about her.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Neither Nader nor Whittington are correct.
Libertarians want such little regulation that it is easy for some market participants to gain a monopolistic position from which they can game the system.
Palin's ideas are more, heaven forfend, populist. She would like to see sufficient regulation to prevent any company from gaming the system either through bribing government officials or ruling from a monopolistic roost.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wish I could come with a word that isn’t “stupid” to describe these people.
3 posted on
09/19/2011 10:37:04 PM PDT by
svcw
(Do liberals get brain freeze if they eat ice cream to fast? (probaly not, no brains))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The problem is, as Nader will no doubt shortly discover, while his approach to anti-corporatism stems from a socialistic perspective, Palin's comes from a libertarian point of view. [dramatic sting] DUM-DUM-DUUUUM!
10 posted on
09/20/2011 12:41:38 AM PDT by
denydenydeny
(The moment you step into a world of facts, you step into a world of limits. --Chesterton)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This isn’t a good thing for Palin...Nader is the most anti-capitalist around...
16 posted on
09/20/2011 9:47:23 AM PDT by
shield
(Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson