Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Sarah Palin turned down invitation to tonight's CNN/TPX debate
Texans for Sarah Palin ^ | 12 September 2011 | Josh Painter

Posted on 09/12/2011 2:48:42 PM PDT by Windflier

According to this post title at The Other McCain, Gov. Palin has turned down the invitation that CNN had extended to her to participate in the debate being sponsored tonight by the network and Tea Party Express. We had gathered as much when no news came over the weekend that she had accepted the invitation, and Greta Van Susteren announced that Sarah Palin would be a guest on her "On The Record" program tonight.

If she had accepted the CNN invitation to debate, it would have likely been a violation of her contract with Fox News, a job the governor doesn't appear quite ready to give up -- at least not just yet.

Stacy also reports the results of CNN's latest GOP presidential poll, which has Gov. Palin in third place with 15 percent, behind Ranger Rick with 30 percent and Mitt Romney with 18 percent.

- JP


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2012gopdebates; debates; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

1 posted on 09/12/2011 2:48:54 PM PDT by Windflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Windflier

SP in third place and not even in the race...yet. Now that’s funny. Latest poll has her climbing up since the last CNN poll eh?


2 posted on 09/12/2011 2:52:29 PM PDT by CSI007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSI007

If she had accepted the CNN invitation to debate, it would have likely been a violation of her contract with Fox News, a job the governor doesn’t appear quite ready to give up — at least not just yet.”

This is an accurate statement of what we know, at this moment in time.......nothing more, nothing less....anything else is speculation. Some speculation is more rational than other, but even so....THIS is what we KNOW at this point in time.


3 posted on 09/12/2011 2:54:34 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
I am not surprised by this. Nor do I think this is any indication that Palin is dropping out of the race.

There is the Fox contract.

There's also the overall unimportance of debates this far out from the first primary voting.

Why give the media chances to ask questions designed to make you look bad. The media is 100% on Obama's side in this race. Anything they are doing with the Republicans, they are doing to discredit all the Republican candidates. When Palin gets in, she'll be the focus of more of that than any other candidate. She's letting the media soften up the rest of the Republican field with some early salvos first.

And make no mistake, this is a CNN debate masquerading as a "TEA Party" event. They want the TEA Party there to make these candidates look extreme. The folks at CNN are in no way trying to legitimize the TEA Party. They are trying to support The Won's statement this morning that the TEA Party is so extreme, and that "the vast majority of Americans" have rejected the TEA Party and what it stands for. That's the goal tonight, along with tying the Republican candidates to that (supposedly) rejected platform.

4 posted on 09/12/2011 2:57:29 PM PDT by cc2k ( If having an "R" makes you conservative, does walking into a barn make you a horse's (_*_)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Not running, so why should she?


5 posted on 09/12/2011 2:58:00 PM PDT by Sudetenland (There can be no freedom without God--What man gives, man can take away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSI007

The plan is working. Being the one on the sidelines in a crowded field keeps the spotlight on you. As each candidate folds, the camera pans to the quarterback warming up to replace him or her. Elections are in large measure about name recognition. It’s hard to find fault with her strategy, and anyone who still doubts that she is running should readjust their medication immediately.


6 posted on 09/12/2011 2:58:35 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

That will probably be the LAST ‘common sense’ post on this thread... :-)


7 posted on 09/12/2011 2:58:39 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

Elections are won on POSITIVE name recognition, something that Mrs. Palin is sorely lacking.


8 posted on 09/12/2011 3:01:45 PM PDT by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Of course she did! She cant make money at the debate can she? She’s a celebrity! She isn’t now, and never will be, a candidate for president in 2012.


9 posted on 09/12/2011 3:02:00 PM PDT by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
You are way out there...ummm...Astronaut? (couldn't resist;)
10 posted on 09/12/2011 3:07:53 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("Count to ten when dealing with fools--with liberals make it twenty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

Which is especially noteworthy since my post said basically....nothing!


11 posted on 09/12/2011 3:08:48 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cc2k

Sadly I was mistaken in my belief that conservatives had learned anything from previous elections. Unfortunately conservatives are even more willing to trade their principles for the first RINO to rattle the grain bucket.

It just amazes me that now we’re not only trying to eliminate candidates before the first vote is taken but even before the candidates even decide on running.

I’m not even a Palin supporter and I’m not counting her out.


12 posted on 09/12/2011 3:11:14 PM PDT by cripplecreek (A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a Permenant Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Windflier; 1_Rain_Drop; 4woodenboats; Abbeville Conservative; abigail2; ABQHispConservative; ...

**********Palin Ping**********

Also, Gov. Palin will be on Greta’s show tonite 10:00 PM EST.


13 posted on 09/12/2011 3:11:29 PM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: "You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I said a while ago that more to the point, Fox will NOT allow her to end her contract and it has spurred some animosity between her and Fox. It is more likely they have given her a drop dead date and she must fulfil her contract until then. That is why I think she went to Fox while she was on her first bus tour.
They might be trying to hold on to her until they think she would no longer be a viable candidate. She HAS been trying to reach out to other networks in ways that she does not break her contract with Fox, but she can’r sit for an interview or appear as a guest on any other network. I really don’t think she has a choice.


14 posted on 09/12/2011 3:11:34 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Bovina Sancta!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magritte

Really? Gov. Palin has the gravitas and sincerity
that are lacking in Bishop Romney and Captain Gardasil.


15 posted on 09/12/2011 3:12:42 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
Which is especially noteworthy since my post said basically....nothing!

LOL...exactly! (Worked well for Seinfeld...)

16 posted on 09/12/2011 3:15:21 PM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Run Sarah, run!


17 posted on 09/12/2011 3:15:58 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude; Windflier; Virginia Ridgerunner; onyx; MestaMachine

“If she had accepted the CNN invitation to debate, it would have likely been a violation of her contract with Fox News, a job the governor doesn’t appear quite ready to give up — at least not just yet.”
~~~~~~~~~~

I thought Palin had already accepted invitation to attend debate? If so, she would have done so knowing her status with Fox. What changed? Am I mistaken that she had already accepted?


18 posted on 09/12/2011 3:16:44 PM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Palin would never have entered a contract with FOX that she could not have left at will. She is an independent contractor.

She is smart enough to know that FOX could screw her.

Best,

Chris


19 posted on 09/12/2011 3:22:30 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
Fox will NOT allow her to end her contract

You're digging pretty deep for excuses.

So, Fox News would risk the animosity of a potential future president by not letting her out of a contract? So, Sarah's so naive and innocent that she didn't include provisions in the contract to end it were she to run?

I sense you're a Palin backer, but you really cut her short shrift.

20 posted on 09/12/2011 3:24:42 PM PDT by BfloGuy (Keynesians take the stand that the best way to sober up is more booze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson