[The Bronze Titan]

Anything that tries to point out some concern about Perry is a “hit piece”. Oh, but wait, I see you’re not opposed to “vetting”, just so long as the “vetting” is all “positive”. I get it now.

[Nervous Tick]

Oh, but wait, I see you’re not opposed to “vetting”

Give us a break. You're not vetting. You're a hatchet man. Plain and simple.

Or maybe you'd like to explain to us exactly what you're "vetting" when you post hateful DU-style cartoons you steal from left-wing websites?

[xzins]

Oh, but wait, I see you’re not opposed to “vetting”, just so long as the “vetting” is all “positive”. I get it now.

Absolutely, yes, the vetting of conservatives by other conservatives is to be positive.

Answer me this ... would you rather have Perry as a senator in Congress or would you rather have Romney?

Conservatives are insane to destroy another conservative who is not their first choice. Lord knows that Perry is FAR more conservative than Scott Brown, but you were ok with Brown in order to "throw egg" on Kennedy in Massachusetts.

And interestingly you said this a few months ago:

I am supporting Palin if she runs. That being said, my advice to everyone: Don’t get worked up on ‘who’ supports ‘whom’ in the Republican Pres primaries. Support whomever you feel is the most honest and sincere in carrying out the conservative agenda once elected to office. In the end, we will need to support whomever gets the nomination if you are really worked up about the POS we have in office now.

[Twink]

And anything negative about Palin gets the same treatment and she ain’t even in the race yet. RME.