Replies

Oh, but wait, I see you’re not opposed to “vetting”, just so long as the “vetting” is all “positive”. I get it now.

Absolutely, yes, the vetting of conservatives by other conservatives is to be positive.

Answer me this ... would you rather have Perry as a senator in Congress or would you rather have Romney?

Conservatives are insane to destroy another conservative who is not their first choice. Lord knows that Perry is FAR more conservative than Scott Brown, but you were ok with Brown in order to "throw egg" on Kennedy in Massachusetts.

And interestingly you said this a few months ago:

I am supporting Palin if she runs. That being said, my advice to everyone: Don’t get worked up on ‘who’ supports ‘whom’ in the Republican Pres primaries. Support whomever you feel is the most honest and sincere in carrying out the conservative agenda once elected to office. In the end, we will need to support whomever gets the nomination if you are really worked up about the POS we have in office now.

-"Conservatives are insane to destroy another conservative who is not their first choice."

Ok, let's keep quiet on Perry. Let's not say anything that might upset ANYONE, lest they think that we might be for the Socialist.

You guys really take the cake. Always trying to deflect from defending Perry's record by resorting to your bogus and phony argument .... 'ok, you want Perry or the Devil' - GIVE ME FREAKING BREAK! The guy's announced only 15 days ago, said he had no clue he even wanted to be President 60 days ago, and we're all supposed BOW DOWN STFU and SING 'HOSANNAH IN THE HIGHEST' the minute he announced?

Here, here's a couple of more "positive" vettings you can try on for size. It's from a couple of radical liberal marxist outlets: 'The Washington Examiner' and "Townhall.com" (tell me how that fits the template of the conservative message from the 2010 elections:

- The cowboy corporatist rides to the rescue

- Rick Perry's NAFTA Superhighway Problem

Absolutely, yes, the vetting of conservatives by other conservatives is to be positive.

Well said!

Other than Romney and Paul I'm happy with any of the candidates. I don't expect we will ever find a perfect candidate, but with a conservative House and a growing conservative presence in the Senate I think whatever flaws our nominee may have will be off set by the Legislative body. One aspect of the Tea Party that doesn't get discussed is their willingness to go against leadership. I think this is great and don't see it changing under a Pub POTUS.