Posted on 08/27/2011 12:10:12 PM PDT by el_texicano
Looks Tough Firing Blanks
If you're a Tea Party member, or you have significant sympathies with them, I'd caution you against climbing aboard Rick Perry's TransTexasCatastrophe. The Media is doing everything possible to paint this guy as a bronc-busting, cattle-roping, Texan, but in truth, there are more than a few things you ought to know about him. He's no friend to individual rights, except in an election season, and he's not really the trend-setter he'd have you believe. His record on jobs isn't actually so swift as he'd have you believe, and he's got less in common with the average Texan than he does with the Wall Street types with whom he prefers to consort. He's no friend of Main Street, and he's certainly no friend to real entrepreneurs, and for all his posturing as one of us, he isn't, and it's been quite plain. Those of you from outside Texas can be forgiven for mistaking Perry for a conservative. It's assumed because he's a Republican, and he's from Texas, he must be. Let me now explain a bit of why this isn't the case.
Friday I heard the increasingly estimable Mark Davis claim that you shouldn't mind that Perry converted from the Democrat Party to the Republican Party because, as he points out, Ronald Reagan was once a Democrat too. Of course, this is a lie by omission, because what Davis doesn't mention is that it was a long stretch of years between Reagan's conversion and his arrival in California electoral politics. This isn't the case with Rick Perry. He was Al Gore's Texas Campaign Manager in 1988, and following the loss, immediately reversed course and ran as a Republican. I don't know about you, but despite Davis' rather disingenuous interpretation of Reagan's conversion, painting it as just alike, I'm inclined to believe he left some details out intentionally.
Rick Perry has been a regular guest on Davis' show on WBAP in the D/FW area for years, and to consider Davis anything like an objective or unbiased voice in this stretches all credulity. Frankly, I hope Limbaugh finds somebody else to be a regular fill in, because Davis is clearly in the tank for Perry, and it runs against Limbaugh's general premise that he will take no position in a Republican primary, except in general terms on behalf of conservatism.
You may have heard some of Perry's more recent statements about conditions along the Texas border with Mexico, and you might be inclined to believe Mr. Perry thinks more should be done. He even tried to repair his credibility on the issue by being broadcast on a live feed from a base of operations near the border for an interview on Greta Van Susteren's show. If you believe that stage-managed bit of theater, I'm inclined to let you know right now that he's relatively no more conservative in real terms than George Bush, which is to say on the matter of his statist, globalist reflexes, he's no conservative at all. I'd hate it if anybody else broke the news to you, because I believe bad news is best delivered by a friend. Check out the following video for where Rick Perry really stands on issues of the border:
watch?v=UwD84nKA5y0
I realize there's a tendency to overstate things in the name of supporting one's position, but it's really no exaggeration to suggest that Perry isn't really very close in his thinking to Tea Party Members, not when measured against what he's been saying since October 2010, but in what he has said all along throughout his career. He's taken money and support from La Raza, ACORN, and other groups that advocate spending tax-payer dollars for dubious programs and projects.
He's also a crony-capitalist. If you're like me, that's simply something you can't abide. I love the free market, but Governor Perry's revolving door between his staff and corporate boardrooms is a well-established phenomenon, and frankly, if you buy into his nonsense, he's going to wind up exploiting your good intentions too. Companies like Merck and Cintra are more his style, and his staff has reflected this over the years of his gubernatorial reign.
You've undoubtedly heard about the Gardasil flap, and likely been willing to dismiss it as a fluke. That would be a serious and potentially tragic mistake. The most ridiculously egregious thing he may have done in his tenure as Governor of Texas was the proposed TransTexas Corridor. You may have heard of it, but may not have any details, so let me expound on that for a moment or two. This was the project that first enlightened me to Perry's big government answers to all things. The upshot is this: It was to be a vast network of toll roads, but more, it would have included some form of light and heavy rail, pipelines, and all manner of things. On the surface, this might sound attractive, but as with any such project, the devil lies in the details.
The plan included 4400 linear miles of a toll road network, running parallel in many cases to existing Highways and Interstates already in existence. The corridor's right of way was to be a full 1/4 mile wide. Simple math tells you that even ignoring junctions and interchanges, this would have consumed 1100 square miles of Texas' territory. You might argue that while it's a lot of land, Texas is a big state. That's all well and good if the state already owns the land, but since it doesn't, it was going to acquire it by use of eminent domain. Again, you might argue that building roads is one function for which eminent domain out to apply, but once you look at the rules to be applied to this project, you might well conclude otherwise. Rather than basing their offers to property owners on free market value, they instead intended to limit it to "fair market value" as determined by a panel of cronies they would gin up for the chore.
This project actually proposed bisecting county and farm roads, and even property, dead-ending what are fairly important thoroughfares for the communities they serve. More, it would have bisected school districts and even towns along its path. Again, you might think that impossible until you understand that this was to be a closed system with few exits or on-ramps, only permitting access at major Highway and Interstate junctions. This threatened to destroy many rural communities, and they rose up against it. Once the details became clear to the public, it was quickly sent back for re-work, and eventually dumped.
Here were the things they didn't advertise, but you need to know. It was supposed to be operate by a concessionaire, Cintra, for a period of 50 years. It was going to employ tolls of roughly $0.26 per mile. A geographical understanding of the scale of Texas immediately prompts the question: "Who on Earth would voluntarily pay to enter a closed-system roadway at that cost over the huge distances in Texas, when a free parallel alternative is just a few miles away in the form of an Interstate, or Highway?" Good question, and the answer is: Almost nobody. So how did they intend to make this work? In 2004,TxDOT applied to the USDOT for a waiver so that they could charge a toll on the existing I-35. The first leg of the proposed TTC system was called TTC-35, the leg that would run from Laredo to an undetermined point on the Oklahoma border. In other words, it was a corridor to nowhere, but in order to get you to use it, they were going to toll the free Interstate and let it fall into disrepair.
Opponents at the time argued that the existing I-35 corridor could be widened, and this was met with a dismissive rejection by Perry's Transportation Commission. They said it couldn't be done in a cost-efficient way. Your confusion at this statement matches that of the average Texan who realizes that this couldn't possibly be true. How hard is it to add a few lanes here and there? Yes, you'll have some eminent domain issues, but nothing on the scale of what the TTC proposed.
They also promised it would promote economic development, but what they kept concealed for a while, until they no longer could do so under the law, was that because it was a closed system, Cintra, the corporation from Spain that would build and operate it, would also have exclusive rights to all concessions along its length. More, due to the limitations on exits and on-ramps, it could never be shown how this colossal highway system would provide any sort of economic boon to anybody, because you wouldn't be able to access most smaller towns from along its length. I'm sure you'll agree with me that the fact that one of Perry's top staffers was a former Cintra VP, and the fact that one of his own staffers had gone on to work for Cintra had absolutely nothing to do with Perry's TTC plans. Right?
Ladies and gentlemen, if you've fallen prey to the hype about Perry, you may be forgiven, particularly if you're not from Texas. You're not aware, as so many here, that Perry isn't the fellow he's now being portrayed to be. He's not a friend to the Tea Party, despite his seeming 2010 conversion, because much like his conversion in 1989, this conversion also seems to be one of convenience. I will assure you, this is most definitely the case.
Perry likes to put on an act about his conservative credentials, and his sympathies with the Tea Party, but if the truth is told, he's no more one of us than the man in the Moon. You might want to let your fellow conservatives and Tea Party patriots know it too: We're being hustled again.
[ Perry is a White Obama. / I can’t imagine any intelligent, rational, SANE person agreeing with this comment. ]
Barry Half-White is an almost white Perry..
He gets off saying it because it’s identical to statements being made on DU. They, too, suffer from Perry Derangement Syndrome.
Nope!
He might be looking at Christie to shore up the East Coast votes.
Sure thing N00b. You've got a whopping 7 months experience in this forum under your belt and you're telling a 10+ year member what should and shouldn't belong here? You haven't been around to know how asinine that is.
Maybe I'm crazy but I kinda like big business. That's where the jobs are.
I don't know if you're crazy or not but your posts suggest you just may be.
For the record, I am for jobs also and I'm all for business; heck, I own one. What I'm not for is a politician who beholden to big business as RINo Rick clearly is.
"Who will you support then?"
I have decided why cross that bridge if I don't have to? As for now, I am 100% Sarah. If she is not on my ballot, I will write her in.
I refuse to lie to myself any longer. As stated previously, if America wants to go to sh$t, so be it. Probably time for another revolution anyway.
I'm just praying to prevent such an occurrence.
Evidently you don’t have a clue about state immunization requirements and government funds paying for it.
What YOU don’t understand is that there were the MANY parents who wanted it. The democrats don’t ever tell you that!
The democrats don’t tell you either that the feds sent down notice to make Gardasil available for those who WANT IT!
Do you have a clue how a state gets an immunization paid for by Medicaid or SCHIP???? It first place it has to be a MANDATED immunization by the state! You can’t just walk into a doctor’s office and demand an immunization for your child and get it paid for.
Get a freaking clue!
The more frenzied the anti-Perry action gets on FR, the more I lean toward him if Palin doesn't run. I think the Romney long-knives are out for Rick.
“Are presidential eligibility requirements the same for VP?”
Yes.
Article XII, Constitution of the United States.
“............But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”
You are probably correct, but these days anything is possible. I hope she at least puts him in charge of homeland security.
Sorry, that is not my recollection of the facts. I read about Perry unfavorably in the past. He was better than KBH for sure. I’m not saying I wouldn’t vote for him. He’s better than Romney. He does have baggage. He is too cozy with everything Mexican. I understand getting elected in a border state is tough.
Hey, we had a president from Hawaii. How about one from ALASKA?
>> I have decided why cross that bridge if I don’t have to?
That I can understand.
What I can’t understand is why so many who prefer Sarah Palin take the battleax to anyone who ISN’T Sarah Palin, primarily because they aren’t Sarah Palin, when Sarah Palin is not yet IN the race.
Seems counterproductive at best, and dangerous to the republic at worst.
Who do you have in mind? You pose the question. Please answer it.
Please.....if you are correct I will eat my crow like a grown responsible adult should. You can rub it in my face as much as you would like (mark this post).
IF, which we highly doubt, she does not run, you are correct....we will be crushed. I will allow you to rub as much salt in my wound as you'd like.
With that being said, not only will she run, but will win.
My own little simple opinion? This will be a grass root vs. grass root election.
I’m not a Texan. I Don’t know anything about Texas. I’m a Californian. There are alot of Mexicans, as well as, Mexican-Americans in California. Consequently, I know about La Raza. I know that it’s a racist, un-American and anti-American organization! Why would the governor of Texas deign to attend one of their conferences? I know that Perry knows what they’re all about. How does he justify that? Or perhaps, he’s never been called on it? Is he for Aztlan?
>> I think the Romney long-knives are out for Rick.
Also the RuPaul long-knives. Many of them learned to hide their true alliegance because of how they were treated here during the last election cycle.
I agree with you. Even if Sarah gets in and these idiots are indicators of her supporters, then I will have my doubts about what she attracts. bigots, fools and idiots seem to be running loose here.
I don’t want to rub it in your face. I want Obama gone. Pew just came out with a new poll you might find interesting. In a nutshell, it says 67% of voters say they will never vote for Palin. And she knows this from her own internals. http://www.politicususa.com/en/sarah-palin-never-vote
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.