So please, dear LeGrande: Just speak up and tell us what that "evidence" is.
Let me put it in a manner that you might understand : )
I testify that God is a pink Leprechaun. If you disagree with that assertion (and I fervently hope that you do) then please provide evidence supporting your denial of my assertion.
Do you now see how ludicrous your position is?
It is pretty simple. I do not accept your assertion. Now if you want me to accept it give me a reason to.
You do not have to accept the assertion that God has all attributes. It would be reasonable for you to ask me, had I asserted such, to give proof or evidence for such. I have not. I do not assert that God is evil.
Now you asserted that wave collapse is uncaused. Show me.
Wrong, because it's up to you to provide evidence to support your assertion.
We have provided evidence and you have consistently disallowed it, a standard tactic of evolutionists. Just because you don't like the evidence and don't want the assertion to be true, does not mean that the evidence is not valid.
You are free to reject it, but to maintain credibility, you must provide a valid reason for rejecting it, other than the fact that you don't want to admit that there is a Creator who lays claim to your life.
You can "testify to" whatever assertion you like, LeGrande. You can "testify" that the moon is made of green cheese for all I care.
What is "ludicrous" is to debate with a fool — especially the fool who very likely has zero experience of pink leprechauns, and yet nevertheless "tesifies" that God is one.
In short, not only do you have zero "evidence" for (or knowledge of) the existence of pink leprechauns, but you insist nonetheless on identifying the pink leprechaun with God.
Since you presumably know nothing of pink leprechauns (or of God for that matter), on what basis do you assert this connection?
Answer: Only to insult me, and to disparage God.... Your idea of "debate" seems to be modeled along the lines of a food fight, or combat by spitball....
Why should I take your "testimony" seriously when it has no basis? What planet do you live on anyway?
Seems to me if you want to play "'word games," perhaps it would be best for you to stick with Scrabble.