You can "testify to" whatever assertion you like, LeGrande. You can "testify" that the moon is made of green cheese for all I care.
What is "ludicrous" is to debate with a fool — especially the fool who very likely has zero experience of pink leprechauns, and yet nevertheless "tesifies" that God is one.
In short, not only do you have zero "evidence" for (or knowledge of) the existence of pink leprechauns, but you insist nonetheless on identifying the pink leprechaun with God.
Since you presumably know nothing of pink leprechauns (or of God for that matter), on what basis do you assert this connection?
Answer: Only to insult me, and to disparage God.... Your idea of "debate" seems to be modeled along the lines of a food fight, or combat by spitball....
Why should I take your "testimony" seriously when it has no basis? What planet do you live on anyway?
Seems to me if you want to play "'word games," perhaps it would be best for you to stick with Scrabble.
For those who are old enough, the manager of the NY Yankees in the late forties and through the fifties and most of the sixties was a man named Casey Stengel. During interviews his conversation was so convoluted and confusing it earned the nickname of Stengelese. I think LG may be Casey reincarnated.
Since you presumably know nothing of pink leprechauns (or of God for that matter), on what basis do you assert this connection?
Answer: Only to insult me, and to disparage God.... Your idea of "debate" seems to be modeled along the lines of a food fight, or combat by spitball....
Thank you for sharing your insights, dearest sister in Christ!