[LeGrande]

I started at the top of your list. Let's take them one at a time. And you should note that I did answer it by asking you a question that you failed to respond to. If you would have answered the question, you wouldn't be having this problem.

Metmom didn't even recognize E=MC2, That should tell you all you need to know about her background.

Prove it. Provide the link to the post.

First off are you denying it? If you aren't denying it what is the point of pulling up the reference? This is a bit like Elsie's non denials of being a man. Or Colorcountries claiming that the lack of DNA evidence is proof of polygamy. : )

[metmom]

Yeah, I’m denying your claim. Why else would I have wanted you to prove your assertion?

You made the claim. Be a good scientist and back it up.

[metmom]

First off are you denying it? If you aren't denying it what is the point of pulling up the reference? This is a bit like Elsie's non denials of being a man. Or Colorcountries claiming that the lack of DNA evidence is proof of polygamy. : )

You also seem to be singularly incapable of recognizing when people aren't playing your silly little games because all they are is diversion tactics you employ when you are getting pinned down on something you don't want to answer, or more accurately can't answer because they reveal that your position is untenable.

People are not interested nor willing to be manipulated by the likes of you.

[metmom]

First off are you denying it? If you aren't denying it what is the point of pulling up the reference? This is a bit like Elsie's non denials of being a man. Or Colorcountries claiming that the lack of DNA evidence is proof of polygamy. : )

Oh, and you can drop the smilies. Nobody is impressed.

[mrreaganaut]

This is a bit like Elsie's non denials of being a man.

"He's a man-man, baby!"

[Elsie]

This is a bit like Elsie's non denials of being a man.

Other folks deny being idiots; but until EVIDENCE is forthcoming, one can make up their own minds...