Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB
Really, I don't need to read further, because this is a false assumption based on nothing but an assumed worldview. In other words, you reject another possible framework because it doesn't fit your assumed, baseless, and arbitrary framework. Circular thinking.

You are just plain rude.

I put a lot of thought and effort into making that reply, because an honest answer to the question required it and couldn't be delivered through a flippant comment.

You should have stated up front that you had no intention of even reading any response that doesn't support your preconceived opinion; it would have saved me an hour of effort.

The least you can do if someone is going to take time to make a thoughtful reply to you is read it. Even if you disagree with it.

163 posted on 08/22/2011 6:55:30 AM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

I read the rest of your post after my response.

The rest of it, also, portrayed assumptions of what a “designed universe would look like”. “Would look like” to whom?

Funny that you refer to my “preconceived opinion” without seeing the plank in your own eye. I understand my own assumptions and what my “ultimate authority” is, do you understand yours?


165 posted on 08/22/2011 7:06:39 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson