Again, admitting equivalence as CS admits physical equivalence.
“... it is the main tenet of the Einstein theory that any two ways of looking at the world which are related to each other by a coordinate transformation are entirely equivalent from a physical point of view.... “
Hoyle, Fred. Nicolaus Copernicus. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., 1973.
Again, geokineticists always ignore the mass of the rest of the universe, while geocentrists always include it.
Again, “So why continue to imply that the two systems are not equivalent under GR when the quotes of learned men have been provided to you?”
So you think Geocentrism is correct and explained by “the mass of the rest of the universe”.
That is ludicrous and incorrect.
The Earth orbits around the Sun.
Science will always be “a weapon” to such a ludicrous view of the universe that has the small mass of the Earth motionless while the gravity from “the mass of the rest of the universe” moving the Sun around it.
No need to let evidence convince you of anything! Why that would be putting “the words of men” above “the Word of God”.
As you see it.
Ah, but geocentrists account for the mass of “the rest of the universe”!
Show me the math! The force of the mass of “the rest of the universe” is both equal to counteracting exactly the gravitational pull of the Sun upon the Earth while also being necessary and sufficient to move the Sun around the Earth - while simultaneously (and magically) not having an effect upon the Earth as far as tides and such.
That must be some serious meaningless apologetics!
The rest of the thinking world knows that gravity holds the Earth in orbit around the Sun - all amusing coordinate systems aside.