So you think Geocentrism is correct and explained by “the mass of the rest of the universe”.
That is ludicrous and incorrect.
The Earth orbits around the Sun.
Science will always be “a weapon” to such a ludicrous view of the universe that has the small mass of the Earth motionless while the gravity from “the mass of the rest of the universe” moving the Sun around it.
No need to let evidence convince you of anything! Why that would be putting “the words of men” above “the Word of God”.
As you see it.
Ah, but geocentrists account for the mass of “the rest of the universe”!
Show me the math! The force of the mass of “the rest of the universe” is both equal to counteracting exactly the gravitational pull of the Sun upon the Earth while also being necessary and sufficient to move the Sun around the Earth - while simultaneously (and magically) not having an effect upon the Earth as far as tides and such.
That must be some serious meaningless apologetics!
The rest of the thinking world knows that gravity holds the Earth in orbit around the Sun - all amusing coordinate systems aside.
Yes dreamy.
We know that you like to imply that quotes from Einstein, Infeld, Hoyle, Born and Ellis showing the equivalence of geokineticism and geocentrism under GR can be ignored.
We also know that you like to imply that there is a physically significant difference even though you have admitted that geokineticism and geocentrism are equivalent coordinate systems under GR.
Nothing new...