Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America

In Barack Hussein Obama’s America, ordinary Americans exercising their Constitutional rights are considered “terrorists”, simply because they oppose his radical agenda.

Obama’s contempt for us knows no bounds. His plan to suppress us is no longer constrained by the Constitution and the rule of law. Or so he hopes.

Although Obama is trying to empty Guantánamo Bay of real terrorists, it is still too small for Obama to house the millions of Americans who now realize that he is an illegal President and has committed felonies both before and after occupying the White House.

To facilitate the suppression of free speech and other Constitutional rights, the Obama White House has unveiled a new domestic terror strategy, which will be useful against Tea Party malcontents and supporters of Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann.

According to the plan, local communities around the country are best suited to take on the challenge of combating the kind of violent extremism that inspires people to kill or oppose Obama’s policies. The strategy calls on federal agencies to help police, schools and community groups prevent violent extremism or the exercise of former Constitutional rights through the use of gulags and re-education camps.

Unfortunately for Obama, his co-conspirators and sycophants, the scam is starting to unravel.

Who will be sent to prison with Obama? Who will cop a plea for immunity from prosecution? (hint) Which members of Congress will be put out to pasture for their complicity?

Gunny, you asked: “Who will be sent to prison with Obama?”

Let’s start with Senator John McCain. He knew Obama was ineligible for POTUS. Then we should prosecute the sponsors of Senate Resolution 511: (then) Sanator Obama, (then) Hillary Clinton, Senator Tom Coburn, Senator Robert Menendez and Senator Claire McCaskill who introduced the Senate Bill.

(I’ve read in a different article that Senator Jim Webb and not Menendez actually helped sponsored the Senate Bill... not sure which)

I’m am still not convinced that McCain, himself, was eligible having been born in civilian hospital OUTSIDE the jurisdiction of the US and NOT on a US Naval Base as some have declared. I know some folks on this Free Republic may have a problem with my position. Fire away! But first read: “Obama Knew He Wasn’t Eligible For POTUS” and the link therein to Professor Gabriel J. Chin’s Discussion Paper on “Why Senator John McCain Cannot Be President.” ...Perhaps McCain should pick his parents more wisely next time around.

Next: Nancy Pelosi for forging and misrepresenting the DNC Certifications of Nomination for Obama to the States.... prosecute the Notary also who signed her name to these documents.

That’s a start.

Here’s a little tidbit of info that I had forgotten about til recently (because it’s part of a broader article on Hillary).

There have been articles recently pointing out previous attempts of changing the Constitution to make way for a non-nbc candidate—but none of the newer ones refer to the Arnold Amendment...

“Excerpt

In point of fact, about the time this article appeared in 2004, an effort was being made to enact what became known as “the Arnold Amendment” that was purportedly designed to change the laws of the land to provide for naturalized citizens like California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm to legally seek the office of President of the United States. The Arnold Amendment was really the Screw America Amendment since it was covertly designed to legalize Hillary Clinton’s run for the roses.

Since Hillary knows that 60% of the American people—men and women—will never vote for her, telling people the purpose of the Arnold Amendment was to degenderize Article II of the Constitution, the amendment would be a non-starter. But then, even without being told, most people figured it out because the Arnold Amendment appears to be stuck in limbo.

Even before his term of office expired at noon on January 20, 2001, President William Jefferson Clinton was quietly querying friendly members of the U.S. Supreme Court to see if they would be inclined to rule that the 22nd Amendment prevented a president from serving more than two terms in the White House, or if there might be five justices on the high court who could be legally persuaded that the 22nd Amendment didn’t exclude the president from serving more than two terms, only that it prevented him from serving more than two consecutive terms.

If the Justices could be convinced to frame a ruling based on what Clinton believed was “the spirit” in which the 22nd Amendment was offered for ratification rather than the high court adhering to the letter of the language within the amendment, Clinton might have been able to return to the presidential political arena in 2004 and challenge the son of his old nemesis.
However, the consensus Clinton sought from the justices of the high court escaped him. It was the view of the US Supreme Court that the 22nd Amendment was clear and unambiguous. No man could hold the office of President for more than two terms. And, any president serving two years and one day of the unexpired term of a former president was ineligible to seek reelection at all.

There had been idle chatter in...”

*****

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.