Most of the male yout's seemed to be thirty something party or union organizers (the difference between the Labour party and some unions is blurred BTW, and with Labour in charge of the country that makes some of these union guys members of the government anyway).
From what we could pick up from INTERVIEWS with female survivors, they were mostly late teenage/early twenty something dusky maidens from South India or Bengla Desh ~ or, some American girls out cruising for free drinks and eats.
I think you get the idea of what that sort of situation is when you add in plenty of alcohol, no discipline, no clothes ~ just little makeshift blanket-tents, .......................
Then the Nazi guy shows up and starts shooting them.
I don't think this had to do with anti-semitism, but it certainly had a lot to do with gross stupidity by the event organizers ~ did you realize that when seconds counted the cops took 90 minutes to respond?
The military and the cops couldn't locate a single helicopter anywhere that could come to help take the wounded out for quick medical care, and the "boat"?
Somebody had a "boat"? Rescuing the leider? Sure! And then they left the boat tied up at the mainland shore with everybody else just abandoned on the island.
I think before this event ceases to be news the Labour party and Labour government leidership are going to be thoroughly trashed ~ as they should be.
I was a bit puzzled by the yutes too
You’re misrepresenting the footage, the camp, and who got shot. Why? To make his crime less horrible? To make the victims less sympathetic?
These were young men and women in their teens - 21 at most.
There aren’t any “dusky maidens from South India or Bangla Desh” in the lot - the only ones in the footage are blondes. The boys all seem to be in their late teens- look at the footage. You seem to be stating that this was some kind of orgy camp - just the opposite.
I wonder if you even watched any news footage at all, considering how badly you are describing it. You know what they say at a trial, don’t you? The legal principle is “False in one, false in all.” All of your “testimony” can be ignored. Unless you can verify your statements with links, you should stop talking about what you “saw.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUr-nuPIIBI
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/07/23/norway.explosion/index.html?iref=BN1&hpt=hp_t1
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14268100
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14266525
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14266528
About the clothes thing, they are more free-er over there than we are here. Back in the early 70s, I was shocked to see billboards of gals with their hoohoos showing in unzipped jeans, X rated tv, and ladies of the evening showing off their “merchandise” in storefront windows.
There are many, many little private islands (land of fjords)so there are tons of private boats. Norway has a huge fishing industry (duh) so there would be countless means of getting to the island “if” the citizens knew about the crisis. However, the police wouldn’t want citizens out there so they probably didn’t ask for assistance but relied on their own boats which failed. The island is also 25 or so miles out to sea so that took precious time. I also wonder if they knew exactly which island and where on the island the camp was located. I’m not giving them a pass but just saying it’s not exactly a quick Hollywood car chase around the corner.