>> “She called the Obama eligibility issue ‘distracting’ and ‘annoying.’ “ <<
That does not place her “with” McClintock, since she has also indicated her disbelief in his eligibility more than once. She is simply such a political pragmatist that she is unwilling to allow the issue to take up her time and space.
Since the rest of us do not aspire to high office, we can allow it.
That does not place her “with” McClintock, since she has also indicated her disbelief in his eligibility more than once.
I recall Palin responding, when asked about Trump's quest for Obama's LFBC, something along the lines of, "Yes, let's get it out there for everyone to see."
That statement came closer to outright calling Bammy an ineligible president, than anything I've heard from any other presidential candidate. Unfortunately, for political pragmatism's sake, that's about as close as she could come to that flame without getting burned.
There are more than enough other battles where Palin can easily beat Obama, but the eligibility issue isn't one of them. People must follow where a politician leads, and Palin is wise enough to see that there simply aren't enough troops lined up on that front to win the day.
I love your tenacity in the face of ridicule of the ignorant, and how you slay the naysayer’s with truth.
‘Don’t you know that rational people have moved on’ has become one of the true hard hits from our brothers that we see all the time as the continual ‘nothing to see here’ causing the serious divide between all of us conservatives and dividing who is and is not holding dear our Constitution.
‘Don’t you know that rational people have moved on’ has become one of the true hard hits from our brothers that we see all the time as the continual ‘nothing to see here’ charlatans causing the serious divide between all of us conservatives and dividing who is and is not holding dear our Constitution.