Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
I'm not sure his EO really means much. I think it was already a requirement of all FFL holders to report suspicious purchases and attempts to purchase. Even if it wasn't Phoenix ATF agents have already gone on the record as saying that all the gun shops in their jurisdiction were calling them up about the straw buyers.

This was almost purely a propaganda move aimed at creating a distraction and a veneer of responsibility.

26 posted on 07/14/2011 8:42:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
I think it was already a requirement of all FFL holders to report suspicious purchases and attempts to purchase.
Then if that is what you think then you need to ask yourself a question - Why is an EO needed when a law already covers it.

And so far I haven't seen the text of the this purported EO. If you know where it's at I'd like to see the text to compare to the law.
FFL NEWSLETTER FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEE INFORMATION SERVICE
FFLs and law enforcement have a long-standing history of mutual support and concern for public safety. Therefore, we ask you to report suspicious activity by purchasers or attempted purchasers.

A law, or EO, orders or mandates. A Newsletter asks. Where's the Law? /WTB! Old Lady
Which law orders them to report anything?
As far as I can see at this point it's voluntary reporting and nothing more.
I'm looking.

38 posted on 07/15/2011 5:13:19 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson