Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

There’s no mention of Minor v Happersett in that page. Is that what you were seeking?


47 posted on 07/01/2011 6:23:16 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: STARWISE

Donofrio posted a screen cap of what he said was the current page. Somebody tried to say that since the page NOW (after Donofrio had posted to alert people of this) has “Minor v Happersett” on it, Donofrio must have forged the screenshot. Went into the standard Obot drivel about tin foil hats and how nobody who is interested in facts would be fooled by this, how stupid conspiracy theorists are because Donofrio probably forged the screenshot.... blah, blah, blah.

Well, like you say, the reference to “Minor v Happersett” is not in the Google cache taken from June 21st. I just wanted somebody to post the image before Google updates their cache to get rid of the evidence. I’ve got the screenshot saved but can’t post it on my blog because it’s the wrong format.

Donofrio has shots from the Way Back Machine showing it was like that since 2008. So from 2008 until at least ten days ago the reference was edited out, and sometime within the last 10 days (Donofrio says within the last day or two, depending on when he posted his analysis) it was changed.

So all the big garbage about Donofrio forging the screenshot is shown to be wrong. The left ALWAYS projects onto others what they themselves do. Always. Predictable and pathetic.


67 posted on 07/01/2011 8:22:33 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson