Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kleon
It makes the text crisper and easier to read. I don't need to explain why that would be preferred when scanning older documents.

Yes, why settle for an original reproduction of a witness signature when we can have a NEW! DIGITIZED! version?

Crisper and easier to read is not an improvement over "true and correct."

56 posted on 06/27/2011 7:55:43 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama hides behind the Grass Skirts of Hawaiian Bureaucrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; Kleon
Try: ONE AND ONLY. Once you photograph then digitize the original hard copy for storage, that's the end of the story as far as the law goes.

"They" only have to go back to a certified copy, not to the original hard copy. I suspect the original hard copies in Honolulu county are out there in the landfill

63 posted on 06/27/2011 8:41:51 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson