[muawiyah]

Try: ONE AND ONLY. Once you photograph then digitize the original hard copy for storage, that's the end of the story as far as the law goes.

"They" only have to go back to a certified copy, not to the original hard copy. I suspect the original hard copies in Honolulu county are out there in the landfill

[DiogenesLamp]

Try: ONE AND ONLY. Once you photograph then digitize the original hard copy for storage, that's the end of the story as far as the law goes.

"They" only have to go back to a certified copy, not to the original hard copy. I suspect the original hard copies in Honolulu county are out there in the landfill.

I don't know if anyone is insisting on the Original paper document. What we are insisting on is a Chain of custody to the original paper document. Microfiche's are still available, but if they are not, then Obama is just out of luck as far as i'm concerned. Digitized abstracts are in my mind a breaking of the chain of custody, and therefore not acceptable as proof.

If Hawaii has destroyed it's Microfiche copies, then it is run by idiots who have seriously mismanaged the records of it's citizens, rendering those records useless for certain legal requirements.

Apart from that, we have the comments from the various heads of DOH that the document still exists. Fukino described it as "half written half typed." A description that looks nothing like what has been shown, but is a good description of what a "born at home" affidavit ought to look like.