Replies

You have been on almost all of these threads - do you think the LFCOLB issued by the White House is authentic?

I am now prepared to issue the following authoritative pronouncement on that subject:

Heck, I don't know.

Might be, might not be.

In spite of many claims to the contrary, no one's produced any evidence it isn't that would stand up in a court of law.

Doesn't mean it's genuine, doesn't mean it's not.

There are two possible ways he could be ineligible to hold the office. He could have a fake birth certificate, or the Constitution could require birth on US soil by TWO US citizen parents.

Since there's no good evidence for the first, and the second is apparently not the case (once you do enough reading on the matter), anyone who pushes those two issues too hard is ultimately only going to end up disappointed or embarrassed.

And in the end, we're just simply going to have to vote the guy out.

And I know. I'm kind of a meanie, or at least a wet blanket, for stepping on people's fantasies. The problem is, unless someone produces some real compelling evidence of forgery that we've never seen before, that's all they are: fantasies; and sooner or later, one way or another, they're going to lead to disappointment anyway.

And the disappointment, if it comes in the form of believing that the failure to remove Obama was due to a failure of the system, will lead to a false belief: that our American system is so corrupt that it can't clean out an obviously ineligible pretender to the nation's highest office.

I don't see any evidence that's the case. From all I see, except for the fact that essentially no one vetted the man in the first place - which in itself is a HUGE problem and ought to be fixed - the system at this point is probably okay.

There just isn't the evidence for ineligibility that some claim there is.

“In spite of many claims to the contrary, no one’s (sic) produced any evidence it isn’t (sic) that would stand up in a court of law.” - JW

Interesting, you have commented so many threads, usually supporting the status quo WRT Obama. have challenged many reviews of the LFCOLB, and gone back and forth with many posters regarding the LFCOLB. After all this, you are undecided?

How do you determine that none of the *many* reviews will stand up in court?

Are you in the legal profession?

Are you aware that some claims (Vogt) (Gulf drilling case) have been submitted to the legal system?

What motivates you to post on all these LFCOLB threads?