Romney vs. Palin (The Huckabee decision and its ramifications)

June 19, 2011 | techno

[secondamendmentkid]

“..I just can’t allow it to happen when I am reading the tea leaves..”

Hey, predictions are okay, just make sure you are not reading marijuana leaves. Also, you may want to take the Herman Cain sign out of your yard.

You omitted baby killing abortionist, tax and spender, twitter sexter, CFR member, among others that you could have been called.

There are occasions when certain members will fly off the handle over any thread or post. Buy yourself a lead suit before the EPA finds out about them and outlaws.

[secondamendmentkid]

“..I just can’t allow it to happen when I am reading the tea leaves..”

Hey, predictions are okay, just make sure you are not reading marijuana leaves. Also, you may want to take the Herman Cain sign out of your yard.

You omitted baby killing abortionist, tax and spender, twitter sexter, CFR member, among others that you could have been called.

There are occasions when certain members will fly off the handle over any thread or post. Buy yourself a lead suit before the EPA finds out about them and outlaws.

[secondamendmentkid]

sorry about dupe posts; browser keeps saying service is temporarily unavailable.

[freedumb2003]

>>Buy yourself a lead suit before the EPA finds out about them and outlaws.<<

Dang it, I keep forgetting to suit up.

Does anyone remember poor old Mon El? Just call me “Valor”...

[freedumb2003]

Thanks, AM.

[SoConPubbie]

Bottom line, denotative or connotative, any suggestion that Gov. Palin WON’T run (much less shouldn’t run) is met with insane blind rage. Like yours.

This type of post is considered "Blind Rage" by you?

Since you posted that nonsense, why don't you show us one of these attacks?

Your posts always drip with hyperbole, and exaggeration.

Then when someone exposes that hyperbole and exaggeration for what it is, you pull out the victim card and accuse everyone of attacking you.

Grow up FreeDumb2003, drop the victim nonsense.

[freedumb2003]

Unless and until you understand the difference between denotative and connotative, it is YOU who wars the “victim” mantle.

Gov. Palin either will or won’t run.

I say she won’t.

Look for the exaggeration there.

The most you can find is irritation from prior threads. But I guess irritation is too much for you and your ilk.

I understand and forgive you.

[freedumb2003]

>>You omitted baby killing abortionist, tax and spender, twitter sexter, CFR member, among others that you could have been called.<<

Apparently the new rule is that allegory and sarcasm must now be followed up by specific attribution.

Be prepared to attribute your assertions (we will not call them contentions, since so few understand the difference) to specific posts.

I am sure you, Am2Kid, see the dripping irony.

And thanks for coming along — once the tech problems with FR are solved it should be quite the ride.

Since, as always, the topic is no longer about Gov. Palin — it is a meta topic about Gov. Palin.

[ckilmer]

Because Palin is delaying—texas governor what’s his name is filling the void.

[Lakeshark]

The "blind rage" tag was pretty lame considering I simply challenged a specific line in one of freedumb's earlier posts. It was a simple challenge, no rage, just a request to show us one of those posts that (this is the quote from his post that I challenged):

I await the usual attacks of me as a Romney-supporting homosexual-agenda commie liberal socialist (who needs consistency when you are hurling invective?) illegal-alien-supporter because I DARE predict she won’t run

Why he considered my challenge rage and continued to hyperventilate, I have no idea.

I would suggest he either apologize for the hyperbole of that post, or find some posts that show his statement to be true.

I think you're right, he likes playing the victim........

[freedumb2003]

You aren’t getting my point.

It isn’t me “playing the victim.”

I am pointing out the behavior of many supporters of Gov. Palin. If you don’t get it, I can’t help you.

Your behavior is case in point — I don’t need to refer to any posts beyond this very thread.

Res ipsa loquitur.

[Lakeshark]

Why should we get your point?

You made an insane comment, and can't back it up, or at least apologize for being so stupid to say something that dumb.

Grow up, and yes, you're playing the victim, no one attacked you, I just asked you to back up what appeared to be a dumb statement, and now you're cowering behind "all of Gov Palin's supporters are so mean".

*rolls eyes*

[freedumb2003]

You are so funny. YOU have been caught and now cower behind “oh yeah — prove it!” for a sarcastic comment that hurt your wittle feelings. Your continued attacks on me speak to my underlying point.

Get a pair of big boy pants and take your criticism like gwown-up.

Thanks for the Monday morning LOL.

[Lakeshark]

YOU have been caught

I've been caught? At what, pointing out the absurdity of your statement?

So now you finally admit your comment was sarcastic? A day later?

You need help friend......

[freedumb2003]

You really need to keep up...

Have a great day.

[Lakeshark]

It’s not hard to keep up with a man (?) who can’t admit he said something stupid......

[GlockLady]

Why do you think, last spring, that Huck said he WOULD run if Palin did?