Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Revisiting the concept of PROXY VOTERS in a post-Huckabee era
June 14, 2011 | techno

Posted on 06/14/2011 5:57:49 PM PDT by techno

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: techno

“If you are moderates or centrists who despise Sarah Palin...”

I’m tired of hearing the notion of a lot of Palin haters. I don’t believe it. The media puts that into their discussions of Palin.

Wonder why Palin is surging in Iowa. Are there other states where she’s surging? I wouldn’t be surprised if there were.


21 posted on 06/14/2011 6:35:18 PM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GregB

I don’t know, they could vote for Barack Hussein Obama or Barry Soetero, or that Steve Dunham guy. They do have choices. LOL


22 posted on 06/14/2011 6:37:49 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: frposty

Perhaps I should added the word “elitists” but I did not because there a many pro-choicers or Republicans who favor gay marriage or those who favor gun control who hold Sarah Palin in contempt

I’m sorry if I have offended your sensibilities but polls do show this and that there is NO way they want Palin as the nominee.

And these folks are not dummies. Polls have consistently shown many of these folks are highly educated or high income earners. And they understand vote splitting.

As I mentioned many of these folks given different circumstances in the poll might be compelled to support other candidates like Huntsman or Pawlenty but they now see the lay of the land and realize the simple truth that either Romney or Palin will be the GOP nominee next year. In turn they have made the decision to support Romney to stop Palin. Have you noticed how much Romney has surged in the polls recently and how Pawlenty has plummeted?


23 posted on 06/14/2011 6:44:32 PM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: toddausauras

Thank you. I don’t have any issues with Sarah Palin and would happily vote for her IF she wins the nomination. I may even end up voting for her in the primary but I won’t accept any anointed candidate. Its that simple.

The people clinging to the dumbass Rollins comment need to get over it and concentrate on loading the field with conservatives. Its the only way we’re going to overcome the RINO brigade which is growing daily.

Last year one of the candidates for my district’s primary race had the backing of both Palin and Romney. I disagreed with Palin but understood her reasons and didn’t use it to connect her to Romney.


24 posted on 06/14/2011 6:45:20 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: techno

I am not averse to supporting Palin IF she gets in the race AND IF she proves to be the only conservative that can deny Mitt the nomination.

I support Cain, but his performance last night was lukewarm. I thought Bachmann did well but it’s not untrue that Mitt did himself no damage.


25 posted on 06/14/2011 6:47:06 PM PDT by Grunthor (Make the lefts' collective brain cell implode; Cain/Bolton 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

RON PAUL/s


26 posted on 06/14/2011 6:48:40 PM PDT by Grunthor (Make the lefts' collective brain cell implode; Cain/Bolton 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: techno

More evidence of the Palin surge:

http://recovering-liberal.blogspot.com/2011/06/palin-rises-52-across-7-major-polls.html

PALIN RISES 52% ACROSS 7 MAJOR POLLS—THE TRENDING GRAPH MEDIA KEEPS HIDDEN


27 posted on 06/14/2011 6:49:06 PM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas

In 2008, the stalking horse was supposedly Fred Thompson, holding off the voters until McCain could put his campaign back together — in other words, the “candidate” everybody wanted but who hadn’t actually joined the race.

Thompson finally joined in September, just as some people claim Palin is waiting until September.

Thompson was a strong second in polls, just as Palin is a strong second in polls.

Thompson didn’t pan out once he joined the campaign. We ended up with John McCain.


28 posted on 06/14/2011 7:00:11 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Conservatives also imho have to realize that Palin performs an incredible service for our side. The media hates Sarah so much that they are now promoting Bachmann. So we have the media praising a tea party candidate, that’s great!


29 posted on 06/14/2011 7:02:32 PM PDT by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
I’m concerned Romney may be put over the top by Dems in open primary states. A reverse “Operation Chaos” by the Dems, and after 2008 it’s hard to blame them.

That's how McCain sneaked in at the last moment last time. I thought the Rep. party had some rule changes to fix it?

30 posted on 06/14/2011 7:04:14 PM PDT by CedarDave (Things are so bad at the NY Times they have to outsource their investigations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: toddausauras

I wish Ron Paul would wise up and realize that he can be a kingmaker but he won’t be king.


31 posted on 06/14/2011 7:04:56 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Thompson finally joined in September, just as some people claim Palin is waiting until September.

Thompson was a strong second in polls, just as Palin is a strong second in polls.

Thompson didn’t pan out once he joined the campaign. We ended up with John McCain.

Hmmm, the analogy is good, except, I think Governor Palin has just a little more energy then Fred Thompson.

32 posted on 06/14/2011 7:05:06 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000 (The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

The key difference between Thompson and Palin:

Thompson: stalking-horse

Palin: major player

Thompson blocked for Mccain in SC (got 15% of the vote) and allowed McCain to edge Huckabee out although Huck got 43% of the evangelical vote.

This time Bachmann is the stalking-horse and she is blocking for Romney by attempting to bleed conservative votes away from Palin.

Thus the analogy is NOT comparable. Palin is running neck and neck with Romney and she has not declared yet; Thompson was never challenging Rudy for first place either before he declared or after he threw his hat into the ring.


33 posted on 06/14/2011 7:07:49 PM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Michele cannot, and will not get the nomination. She cannot raise the money needed to beat Romney, and assuming that she somehow can win the nomination she cannot raise the money needed to be Obama. I don’t know why Freepers won’t flow chart this whole scenario for a few minutes.


34 posted on 06/14/2011 7:07:52 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Is that true? The way I remember it Hillary and Baraq fought to the bitter end. Indiana has a very late primary and they were both here campaigning and running zillions of commercials.

I don’t think hardly any Dems crossed over in 2008.


35 posted on 06/14/2011 7:08:16 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
but I’m also pretty sure a Romney candidacy will generate a 3rd party challenger.

Yep.

It is possible that third party will go by the name "GOP" and will be spending all of their hundreds of dollars in donations on their nominee Mitwitt.

.

36 posted on 06/14/2011 7:09:45 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise

Anybody can beat Obama. I intend to vote for the person I wish to vote for. You do whatever you want.

We could look at who has high negatives if you want to, eh?


37 posted on 06/14/2011 7:10:20 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: techno

Simple premise:

If Palin does not run, welcome to Romneyland.

If Palin does run, do anyone really believe she will sink in the polls?

Why is the MSM absolutely terrified of Palin. They know the truth.


38 posted on 06/14/2011 7:10:50 PM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Omg... When Palin announces this race begins. I would admonish you to wait for that, and then you will realize why Michele had to use a gimmick like making the debate her platform for entering the race. Palin will announce in the midst of thousands, Michele couldn’t muster a platoon. I love Michele, I am just speaking the plain truth.


39 posted on 06/14/2011 7:15:15 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

If you live in Iowa, New Hampshire, or South Carolina, you might somehow make a difference with your vote. It will more than likely be over by then, so vote early and often.


40 posted on 06/14/2011 7:17:47 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson