Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/08/2011 7:00:43 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: perfect_rovian_storm; flaglady47; mickie
Why do freepers here think that an apology by MB and a public firing of Rollins will make everything go away?

The damage is irretrievably done by this incident and the media, like a dog clamped onto a juicy bone, will never let it go away.

To tell the truth, I can't find myself getting all worked up over this flap, anyhow. IMO, Bachmann is only a minor league player in the presidential world series.....and will continue to be so. Her role is/would be only as a gadfly or spoiler.

Although her principles are commensurate with conservative thought, she is lightweight presidential material in the grand scheme of things, she will never be president, and becoming all emotional over this Bachmann/Rollins gaffe is a waste of energy and time.

Leni

27 posted on 06/08/2011 7:29:22 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Bring Back the MISERY INDEX! Obama's INDEX! Include Food & Energy in a TRUTHFUL INDEX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

Wasn’t Rollins in charge of McCain’s campaign. The nicey nicey, don’t attack the democrats but skewer the conservatives campaign.


30 posted on 06/08/2011 7:43:02 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
Well, of course she does. Not just for this gaffe, but because the whole concept of her being a legitimate contender for the White House is ludicrous. To repeat myself from yesterday, for those who didn't see it deep in another thread:

I think this is all symptomatic of what, to my own theorizing, is Bachmann's over-estimation of her own standing. Like a case of believing one's own press clippings, Bachmann acts as if she is the "TEA Party queen", to the point of setting up her own caucus in the House.

The problem is, while she may talk the talk, who follows her? She was rebuffed for a House leadership position. Even without that, how many freshman TEA Partiers have joined her caucus and follow her as a leader? What significant legislation owes its passage to Bachmann? What executive experience does she have? And yes, I'll throw in the fact that she's also never won a statewide election.

Just being a "TEA Party favorite" isn't going to cut it. One of the defining features of the movement is a lack of a single leader or small group of leaders. Self-identifying TEA Party sympathizers have wildly different views on a potential nominee, and no one candidate is going to capture all of them. Bachmann will get some, Cain will get some, as will Palin when she runs, but so will Pawlenty, Paul, and even Romney (don't have the link, but a not too distant survey had Romney at over 10% support from self-identifying TEA Partiers).


33 posted on 06/08/2011 8:11:57 AM PDT by kevkrom (Palin's detractors now resort to "nobody believes she can win because nobody believes she can win")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

If she’s got Rollins on board, she lost any chance of getting a vote from me. That guy is a complete weasel.


35 posted on 06/08/2011 8:20:11 AM PDT by Antoninus (Fair warning to the GOP--nominate a RINO and I'm going 3rd party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
Come on Freepers...grow up and stop acting like xbox fan-boys regarding your candidate of choice! This is politics with lots at stake, you are in fantasy-land if you think they will not jockey for position including going after their opponent for advantage. This is the way the game is played. Good grief, I would think you would be pleased with someone actually showing the attack spunk to win as opposed to the my distinguished friend pap.
36 posted on 06/08/2011 8:28:16 AM PDT by Bull Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

He wrote the book on dirty campaigning. Literally!


38 posted on 06/08/2011 8:50:49 AM PDT by McGruff (Run Sarah, Run. Restore this country to what it once was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

The Weekly Standard didn’t think much of Ed Rollins.

ED ROLLINS AND THE END OF HONOR
12:00 AM, Sep 2, 1996 • By ROBERT W. MERRY

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Protected/Articles/000/000/007/306ymoeo.asp


40 posted on 06/08/2011 9:03:47 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

She is running for Mitt’s VP slot.


44 posted on 06/08/2011 9:13:13 AM PDT by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

It’s too late, she has shown all of us her decision making, by hiring a loser to run her campaign.

We can’t blame Rollings, he is only in it for money and glory.

OK Sarah, you’ve seen the conservatives, with a small c, who are in the field. Do what you know is the only way to save our Republic.


46 posted on 06/08/2011 9:39:53 AM PDT by RetSignman ("It's about saving our Republic, STUPID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson