Surprise! Sarah Palin Was Right About Paul Revere

Le-gal In-sur-rec-tion ^ | June 3, 2011 | Prof. William Jacobson

[cripplecreek]

I heard on the Glenn Beck show that one of the riders was a black man.

I believe it was the 12 year old son of a free black farmer. David Barton's Wallbuilders site probably has the info.

[FroggyTheGremlim]

"Well, now I guess the Liberals will tease Paul Revere about his spelling. "

Don't forget "... the purfuit of Happineff ..."

[gitmo]

And how about Obama not knowing what year it was in England???

Well, they are on the metric system over there. =:-)

[blueplum]

several accounts about Paul Revere and his ride:
http://bessel.org/revere.htm

[tcrlaf]

You can forget trying to explain TRUTH, and historical fact to the left, and to the media. All they care about is the narrative.

[tcrlaf]

The problem isn’t the TRUTH, or even historical fact, folks. It’s the NARRATIVE.

I have seen people who don’t pay much attention to politics at all posting this on Facebook, and the narrative sticks, no matter what you try to say to them. They saw it on TV, so it’s GOT to be the truth.

Such is the world in which we live, now.

[MikeSteelBe]

I liked the Beck show about the history of slave ownership, and indentured servitude. The first slave owner in the US was a servant who bought his freedom and bought a slave.

They slave and owner were both Eric Holder’s people.

[Jonty30]

Oh please don’t overreact.

I haven’t seen evidence of Sarah Palin being treated disrespectfully on FR. The only things that have been said was that some don’t think she’s their candidate of choice.

That’s the nature of poliics, we all have our favourites.

[Sea Parrot]

The LSM will never eat crow over anything Palin, they will just cover and smother that crow with a thick sauce of more lies

[Sea Parrot]

Not being snarky and assume you know that s’s and f’s were used interchangeably back then.

But I also assume the LSM do not know that, so your point is well taken,

[devistate one four]

Thank you for the site, I’ll spend some time there.

[Squeeky]

“Don’t forget “... the purfuit of Happineff ...”

LOL!!! They must have written stuff wif peanut butter in their moufs.

[Hildy]

It’s only a set up if she comes out ahead...and as of today, I have seen nothing but the stories about her screwing up...if nobody reports the truth and only her supporters know it, then it’s not a win for her..it’s a loss.

[SoConPubbie]

Oh please don’t overreact.

I haven’t seen evidence of Sarah Palin being treated disrespectfully on FR. The only things that have been said was that some don’t think she’s their candidate of choice.

Well then you are either:

1. Blind as a bat.
2. Had your head in the ground for months
3. Brand new to FreeRepublic.
4. Or a liar.

[Jonty30]

I’ve only been here for a couple of month and nice bit on accusing me of being a liar, but whatever.

I haven’t seen any, as I would define an attack. I’ve read people saying that she might need more experience or that she’d be better off running for another elected office or that they prefer another candidates.

These aren’t attacks. You’ve made these evaluations yourself about other candidates.

An attack is a driven and personalized comment that is meant to damage somebody. For example, “Sarah is a dishonest quitter, because she quit her term as governor halfway. She probably does drugs.”

Commenting on her finishing her term early is not an attack, but accusing her of doing drugs is, because there was no basis for accusing her of doing drugs.

[SoConPubbie]

An attack is a driven and personalized comment that is meant to damage somebody. For example, “Sarah is a dishonest quitter, because she quit her term as governor halfway. She probably does drugs.”

Then I respectfully remove the option of you being a liar.

Do yourself a favor and read more of the Sarah threads, they are very enlightening and should prove to you that there is plenty of "Attacks" being made against Sarah.

Several posters do nothing but troll Sarah threads to post the most thread-bare, logically void, negative statements concerning Governor Palin.

[Jonty30]

I don’t need to read them. I know she’s a capable person.

Far more capable than the team that is cvurrently in the white house.

[jurroppi1]

bttt.