[DelphiUser]

Ken, I have been saying that since long before Free-republic came out of the closet as a site that institutionally dislikes Mormonism.

In the last election, I wanted to address serious concerns about Mitt Romney's so called conservative credentials. I could never get to the discussion because, as a Mormon myself I was always attacked and it was assumed that I was a Romney supporter (when in fact I liked Fred Thompson)

Your position here is a logical one, however, it is one that will not be supported, nor if history here is an indication will it be treated logically and fairly.

I hope you have some asbestos underwear handy...

Delph

[Elsie]

Ken, I have been saying that since long before Free-republic came out of the closet as a site that institutionally dislikes Mormonism.

DU; you FINALLY get it RIGHT!!

[Elsie]

Ken, I have been saying that since long before Free-republic came out of the closet as a site that institutionally dislikes Mormonism.

DU; you FINALLY get it RIGHT!!

[Elsie]

I could never get to the discussion because...

DU; you STILL get it WRONG!!

[Elsie]

I hope you have some asbestos underwear handy...

What IS it with you MORMONs and UNDERWEAR?

[Elsie]

... as a Mormon myself I was always attacked and it was assumed that I was a Romney supporter (when in fact I liked Fred Thompson)

Now now. None of that selective memory stuff!

You were 'attacked' for your slithery use of language; NOT your religion.

But, as most have seen on FR, if a MORMON can successfully steer the conversation so it is SEEN as the INDIVIDUAL is 'attacked' then the RELIGION gets a pass.

Plenty of MORMON Scriptures and writings and teachings have been shown, but MORMON apologists have given up trying to explain, defend and justify them.

---

We're still praying for you; DU!