they don’t have a birth record for Virginia Sunahara?
___________________
They don’t have it. That part is true. Her BC and number now belong to Barry.
Exactly.
But they need to explain why they don’t have a birth record for somebody listed in their 1960-64 birth index.
And while they’re at it they should also explain why they altered their 1960-64 birth index to allow the birth names of adopted children - which are both court-sealed records and legally invalid.
And why they have 2 different versions of their 1960-64 birth index.
Heck, they should just turn over all the embedded computer transaction logs and then we might actually get the truth for once.
they don’t have a birth record for Virginia Sunahara?
___________________
They don’t have it. That part is true. Her BC and number now belong to Barry.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
There is one small, but not fatal, weakness in the Sunahara BC theory. One would have thought that if the forger had access to the Sunahara BC that it would have been used as the base document for the forgery.
But it wasn’t.
The way we know this is that the “1” the Obama BC is clearly seen as a modification if you examine the PDF in Illustrator. That would not have been necessary if the base file was the Sunahara BC.
But of course the forger may not have had access to a scan of the Sunahara BC or may have had some good reason for not using it.