[Kleon]

I didn't see any pictures on page 89 of the book, but I looked at the image you offered. The lines at the bottom are simply not from a scan. They are all a uniform black (RGB=0,0,0) and are not a product of a scan. Maybe they are some frame that Google added? I don't know. As I said I didn't see the source for this.

The image I posted came from page 89 of the PDF file, not the book. The solid black portion is actually part of the illustration, not a frame added later, so it's unlikely that they went in later and added random parts of a picture.

I'm not sure why you still think uniform black pixels are evidence that they are not the product of a scan rather than the product of a well-documented process that enhances elements of the source material.

[ml/nj]

I'm not sure why you still think uniform black pixels are evidence that they are not the product of a scan rather than the product of a well-documented process that enhances elements of the source material.

Because you are full of **it.

No ink scans to black. The Obama uniform black from your "well documented process" was RGB = 26,45,31, not 0,0,0.

ML/NJ