"I follow the COLB fraud threads. You have been shot down on every one of them. You do not offer facts, but claims and testaments."
I challenged you to factually refute the claims I made earlier in this thread. You declined to do so.
Let's be a bit more specific.
The first of the four claims I made that I identified as easily testable was:
Blow the document up to a really high resolution. You can do this just in your web browser. Get the smallest pixels BIG.
Then look, and you will see that the leftmost portions of the typewritten letters dip downward.
Below is indisputable proof of my factual claim.
In the first of my testable claims, then, the author of this piece is incorrect, and I am correct.
It is also a fail for your contention that I do not present factual arguments.
So far, the score of irrefutably proven items is Douglas Vogt 0, PA Engineer 0, Jeff Winston 1.
I would appreciate an apology for your false personal attack.
I can easily dispute it. Your red line on the "M" is very poorly placed and in fact winds up at the bottom of the opening of the center of the "a", making your whole demonstration a distortion!. The same is true of your "Ka" pair... In fact, if you were being honest, your base line on the "Ka" pairing would show NO DROP at all. I will admit the cap line of the "K" does show a one pixel drop, but that is inconclusive when compared with the baseline which shows none at all across the entire word on average. Yet the offset printed Words and stroked lines both have distinctly observable drops. No apology.
Your red line under the K and a in ‘Kapiolani’ is way off. The angles don’t match.