Posted on 05/19/2011 6:28:25 PM PDT by Red Steel
Re: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense. When this comes to the public’s attention, it will be the greatest scandal in the country’s history—nothing comes even close. This will surpass the all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.
My Credentials
I have a unique background for analyzing this document. I owned a typesetting company for 11 years so I know type and form design very well. I currently own Archive Index Systems since 1993, which sells all types of document scanners worldwide and also developed document imaging software (TheRepository). I know how the scanners work. I have also sold other document imaging programs, such as Laser. Fiche, Liberty and Alchemy. I have sold and installed document imaging systems in city and county governments, so I know their procedures with imaging systems and everything about the design of such programs. This will be important in understanding what has happened with Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth.
What President Obama Presented to the Public is an alleged Certificate of Live Birth.
What President Obama presented is not the hospital birth certificate. The birth certificate would have the imprint of the baby’s footprint, weight, length and other information such as the religion. The Birth Certificate would be the source of the same information that would be typed onto the Certificate of Live Birth (the Long Form). What President Obama released is supposedly the Long Form that the County gets from the hospital, which is typed on a blank form given to the hospitals by the county. That copy is then mailed to the county Board of Health and kept as a legal government document. On Obama’s form (Figure 1) the County Clerk supposedly hand stamped the form on the upper right hand corner with a bates stamp. The number is a sequential number that reflects the sequence of Certificates that come into the County Health Department. The reason I know it was stamped by hand is because the number is crooked. The County Clerk also hand stamps the date of acceptance (box 20 and box 22). Obama’s Long Form was supposedly received on August 8, 1961, four days after his birth.
Continued in SCRIBD document below...
News Release: Legal proof that President Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth is a forgery.
Yes, Obama could not come out and ask for "Request for Comments" LoL to forge his birf certificate. He had to use whoever trying not to chance the odds of being caught. One guy I read surmised that Obama and Michelle are the forgers. It sure looks like they could be the makers of that cheesy COLB.
The racial identification on Hawaii birth certificates..fathers and mothers were placed..in one of the following groups.. pg 143.
He says there is kerning in other 1961 Hawaii birth certificates - I have seen it in the WH PDF - but in no others, he has to produce the picture.
He says that the other birth certificates have straight type on curved paper - but I have not seen him post it.
He says the layers are scanning/ocr artifacts - but that has been debunked, and if he wants to demonstrate his own support for that assertion - he is free to do so.
He says the type in the Obama LFCOLB is like all others - lets see him show the cloned elements such as the boxes on other birth certificate scans - I’ve seen it in the WH PDF.
He says Karl Denninger is nuts, but i have seen nothing about Karl’s color aberration analysis that shows editing - not scanning artifact.
Winston is smoking something, and is isn’t tobacco.
We’ve all seen the WH PDF anomalies carefully illustrated - he needs to show his side - not just make claims.
I'm just asking, since his comment doesn't seem to be indicative of an understanding of how computer graphic artwork is done.
HE was the one (like so many) who engaged in an ugly ad hominem attack on me, simply for insisting that we as conservatives ought to do our best to deal in truth instead of falsehood: "you don't have a clue what you are talking about. You are spouting twaddle designed to fool idiots with bullshit."
No engagement of the facts, just ugly ad-hominem personal attack, as if I were not really a human being.
You know, I always thought that truth was a conservative value, but apparently I was wrong.
The fact is, I know very, very well what I'm talking about.
In this very thread I have made at least seven factual assertions. Not a single one of them has been factually refuted. Why? Because every one of them was true.
I have named four specific points that anybody can test and verify for themselves that will demonstrate that yes, I do know what I'm talking about.
And yet, the general consensus seems to have been, "Well hell, we'll just keep believing those four particular falsehoods, because they're falsehoods that we happen to like."
As far as I can recall, not a single important assertion that I've made regarding the birth certificate matter over the past two and a half weeks has been factually disproven.
On the other hand, I've been personally attacked in pretty much every single thread.
I guess I can just give up and let the nutjobs run FreeRepublic and promote demonstrably false nonsense as much as they want.
But is that what we really want FreeRepublic to be? An ideological birther purity club where rational thought and the truth, if it conflicts with the opinion of the mob, are banned?
book mark
Neither are the truthers! They are still convinced they have the evidence that 9-11 was inside job. The fact that no prosecutors, courts, serious commentators or politicians accept their "evidence" only means everyone is in on the conspiracy.
As Beck said, this birth certificate stuff is the dumbest thing I've every heard.
The lawyers arguing for Obama in the eligibility case, at least some of them, have to know the truth. They would have explored closing the cases by providing a birth certificate to the court. The decision to argue on ‘standing’ and not provide a direct refutation must have been debated.
So its a fair call that the Perkins Coe lawyer that picked up a document in Hawaii - and handed it to some PDF/scanning/potential forger was in on the game.
Why did the forger/s make the smiley face? Just to rub peoples’ faces in it? Cos they were on drugs? ??
Don’t you understand that during the scanning process the X’s probably got moved?? /sarc.
I enjoy your stuff and remain a bit open about the birther stuff.....I have no technical background.
I also havent read everything here nor do I think I will ...Is it your contention that the guy who wrote this is a bs artist?
How can a layman evaluate what is true vs false in the technical realm ?....In my mind it all depends on who you trust. If I know nothing technical how do I trust anyone?
I did look up this guys business on google and there is a place in Washington that sells computer stuff....of course how do we know someone didnt just borrow the business name etc.?
To claim that the construction of this document was necessarily done manually by a human being, at a cost of an unbelievable number of hours, for no real purpose other than to produce the worst possible document, rather than by a computer program doing very rational (for a computer program) optimization, is simply insane. Really. It is really and truly insane.
You can believe all you want that the PDF file contains evidence of forgery. It doesn’t.
The AP published a HIGHER-resolution image of the same document in a non-certified format on plain white background.
Of course, that somehow had to be derived from the LOWER-resolution PDF file Obama invested so much effort into forging...
Yeah, you can get a high-resolution document from a low-resolution one. Right?
None of it makes any sense, of course. But you and all the other hard-core birthers will keep believing it, just because it’s what you want to believe.
They need to patent that magical scanning process! It must cure cancer and feed the hungry with all of its magic!
If I see one more OCR theory I am going to puke. If you want to see a real ‘scan’ go look at Bobby Jindal’s. THAT is a scan.
This is a POS image composition - complete with Mr. Smiley!
Take care.
Have you ever typed on a manual typewriter?
It’s called “pushing in the knob at the right and rotating the cylinder to get the X more accurately into the box.”
Some typists did it, some didn’t.
I'm just aaying what the rules are.
Nor did I make them up. I'm just pointing out: these are the rules. Follow them or be considered wacked.
As much as us 60's & 70's types are want to 'appear wacked', that just is not good in debate.
You guys are going to have to duke this out. I'm not here.
IF I catch you breaking rules of logic, I'll break a ball (and you don't have a choice which one).
Piss poor response. Really piss poor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.