[Quickgun]

If the line I read says “illegal” search, then what the court is saying, is that citizens have no right to resist with force, but if the search takes place illegally,and without a warrant,you could still sue the crap out of the city or county that the police worked for?

[Gondring]

IANAL, but yes.

It doesn’t say, “Open season on searching!”

[papertyger]

That's my understanding, too.

Of course, this doesn't address the fact that an already illegal action, being taken under color of law, affords the offending police officer the widest possible latitude to “arrange” the particulars so as to provide themselves with a plausible defense against such a suit.

That means "lie" to save their own ass....

[maine-iac7]

If the line I read says “illegal” search, then what the court is saying, is that citizens have no right to resist with force, but if the search takes place illegally,and without a warrant,you could still sue the crap out of the city or county that the police worked for?

That's what they're saying. AFTER the illegal break in - IF we survive, and IF we have the money, we can sue.

This Marine didn't live to sue

http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2011/may/13/tucson_swat_team_kills_armed_hom

This man, who got invaded - wrong house - went all the way to the SCOTUS - and not only did he not win, the Supreme of Supreme Courts now says the same thing as Indianna...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_supreme_court_warrantless_entry

There is a very chill wind blowing across America - batten down the hatches