They can make an illegal entry, and you can’t do anything about it until after the fact. Assuming you can afford the legal bills to argue about it in court.
So yeah, they can randomly enter your house, and it’s illegal for you to interfere.
About all this is going to wind up doing is costing police officers and citizen their lives. Some officers are going to push their luck, and some citizens are going to exact a terrible price for it. It’s a huge can of worms.
Nice going SCOTUS. Just goes to show a long black robe is no protection for getting your head stuck in a dark stinky place.
They can make an illegal entry, and you can’t do anything about it until after the fact. Assuming you can afford the legal bills to argue about it in court.
And if you have household surveillance systems, the LEOs engaged in the unconstitutional and illegal search will also confiscate (and destroy) the evidence, since they are already breaking the law, its a promise that they will lie, if not plant evidence and frame the homeowner. Remember, even in an illegal search and criminal tresspass by the LEO, the court will always side with their own goons and automatically consider you a serial liar.
Its their goons, their courts and unlimited money from both the unions and the State. Who do you think is going to come out ahead? Not only will they get away with it, but if you piss them off, you will rot in prison for as long as they want to keep you there. If they please, you might just turn out to be the greatest purveyor of child porn, or have a distribution level stash of cocaine, or have destructive devices and enough [planted] "evidence" to send you to G'tmo.
In Houston, there was a story recently where a LEO claimed to be chasing a perp, because of the donuts, quickly lost the footrace, but decided to do a yard-by-yard search assuming the crim was hiding. One property, that just happened to be in his search path, was a fenced and gated lot with a Labrador. Naturally, the dog was quickly gunned down by the LEO. Because the LEO can't even shoot a dog properly, the dog barely survived and the homeowner racked up some serious medical bills trying to heal the wounded pet. The City of Houston's response to the grieving and innocent home-owner was "your dog is property and the city isn't responsible for damages done to your property"
If other municipalities, particularly in the Nazi State of Indiana have the same attitude towards their fellow Americans, then nothing really stops a LEO who has a mind to "teach someone a lesson" from stopping by his victim's house on the way home, crashing the door, shooting the pets, setting fire to the house, beating into a coma the homeowner, and then calling it in claiming "drugs were found in the house", "resisting arrest", "assaulting a police officer" and the reason the house burned is because the meth cook went bad.
And they will get away with it and maybe the thug will even get an extra paid vacation and promotion to boot.