"Video: Attorney Dr. Herb Titus: Born In Hawaii Does Not Make Obama A Natural Born Citizen; The Issue Is Not Going To Go Away..."
If O was born in Hawaii in 1962, to a US citizen, then he is considered under the law in effect then. He is a NBC. What was in effect before or after doesn't apply to him. Only what was the law in 1962.
However, if his mother traveled and stayed outside the country before his birth, then there is a problem. She must have resided inside the US for at least five years after age 18 due to the marriage to a non-US citizen. Obviously, she could not have done that having given birth so young. That part of the law doesn't apply to her marrying a US citizen.
So the focus of any investigation ought to be her travel and residence before his birth or whether or not the BC is real. Hawaii was a state when he was born. I haven't looked the timeline but the I think statehood was in 1959.
Question: When her family moved there and how would that be viewed if they moved when Hawaii was a US possession? You would have to look at the law applying to Hawaii at that time to give guidance.
Actually there IS no proof Hussein was born in Hawaii. But that is a moot point. He is NOT a “natural born citizen” in any event, because BOTH of his parents were NOT born in the U.S. His father—and there is substantial doubt that it actually IS his father—was born in Kenya, Constitutionally disqualifying Hussein from the White House. End of argument.
thanks for the ping, just watched it. It was quite a surprise to learn that Titus is associated with the site I use for my Tucker’s Blackstone study & reference to natural law as well as feudal law.
So why didn’t Atty, Dr. Herb Titus put an argument before the election when it would have mattered? There is no way any court is going to overturn the electoral college. The only way to get him out now is impeachment. Or do you really want one judge to make a decision on the eligibility of any president?