If O was born in Hawaii in 1962, to a US citizen, then he is considered under the law in effect then. He is a NBC. What was in effect before or after doesn't apply to him. Only what was the law in 1962.
However, if his mother traveled and stayed outside the country before his birth, then there is a problem. She must have resided inside the US for at least five years after age 18 due to the marriage to a non-US citizen. Obviously, she could not have done that having given birth so young. That part of the law doesn't apply to her marrying a US citizen.
So the focus of any investigation ought to be her travel and residence before his birth or whether or not the BC is real. Hawaii was a state when he was born. I haven't looked the timeline but the I think statehood was in 1959.
Question: When her family moved there and how would that be viewed if they moved when Hawaii was a US possession? You would have to look at the law applying to Hawaii at that time to give guidance.
1961.
“If O was born in Hawaii in 1962, to a US citizen, then he is considered under the law in effect then. He is a NBC. What was in effect before or after doesn’t apply to him. Only what was the law in 1962”.
?????????????????????????
I thought eligibility for candidacy for the office of president of the U.S.A. was a matter of constitutional provision, rather than statutory law.
Says what "law?"
Haven't got past that issue yet though have we? BC he showed looks like it's a phony.