Posted on 05/10/2011 9:29:00 AM PDT by rxsid
"Video: Attorney Dr. Herb Titus: Born In Hawaii Does Not Make Obama A Natural Born Citizen; The Issue Is Not Going To Go Away...
Video: Attorney Dr. Herbert Titus interview with theAmericanView.com: Dr. Herb Titus Says Most Important Question: Is Obama, Constitutionally Speaking, A “Natural Born” Citizen? Answer: No, He Is Not - The interview embedded below.
BIO: Herbert W. Titus is of counsel to the law firm of William J. Olson, P.C. Prior to his association with this firm, Mr. Titus taught constitutional law, common law, and other subjects for nearly 30 years at five different American Bar Association approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993, he served as the founding Dean of the College of Law and Government in Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Prior to his academic career, he served as a Trial Attorney and a Special Assistant United States Attorney with the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and Kansas City, Missouri. Today he is engaged in a general practice with a concentration in constitutional strategy, litigation, and appeals.
Mr. Titus holds the J.D. degree (cum laude) from Harvard and the B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of Oregon from which he graduated Phi Beta Kappa. He is an active member of the bar of Virginia and an inactive member of the bar of Oregon. He is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the United States Court of Claims, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits. His constitutional practice has taken him into federal district courts in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia and the state courts of Idaho, Texas and North Dakota. -Source.
Atty., Dr. Herb Titus: Obama Not A Natural Born Citizen (YouTube vid)
Haven't got past that issue yet though have we? BC he showed looks like it's a phony.
Well, that's a new one on me. I thought the argument was that the parents had to both be citizens. But you're going beyond that in saying that not only must both parents be citizens, but that both parents must have been born in the U.S. as well.
His father—and there is substantial doubt that it actually IS his father—was born in Kenya, Constitutionally disqualifying Hussein from the White House. End of argument.
Well that's interesting as well. If there is substantial doubt that Obama really is his father, then he there is substantial doubt that his father was born in Kenya, and hence substantial doubt that his father was a British citizen. If you are correct, doesn't that mean there is substantial doubt that he's disqualified?
The fake BC will convince the stupid masses, while us ‘birthers’ will be tied up debunking the BC instead of going after his parentage.
Pretty clever really, it seems to be working."
As you probably know, that is the same kind of tactic that the first usurper used. Chestur Arthur. Keep focus on the birth location, rather than his born with British citizenship. And then burning his papers 1 day before he dies to cover the evidence. What timing! And yes, history does repeat itself.
Correct, unless someone other than Barrack H. Obama, Sr. was his father..... That is possible.
What a mess.
Did you see his resume? Ah, but he’s just some crazy birther who should be dismissed as a kooky conspiracy theorist according to the entire media and the entire Congress.
IF that turns out to be the case, then even this spineless Congress will be forced to impeach and convict him because the questions would turn to:
* Why was there a fraudulent govt document displayed on his campaign web site?
* Why was there a fraudulent govt document displayed on the whitehouse site?
* Why did he take oaths of office at the state and federal level under the false name "Obama?"
* Why did he sign *anything* under the false name "Obama?"
* Why did he solicite and receive campaign donations under the false name "Obama?"
etc., etc.
Either way, the guy is a fraud and the biggest political blunder to ever occur in the Country.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1405.html
And: Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 Again, the question is if he was born in Hawaii and if his mother was in the US for the required amount of time before his birth.
When they moved or statehood?
Thought statehood was 1959...
Please show me the law you are basing your opinion on.
Sorry, I should have been more specific. BHO was born in 1961 — not 1962.
We need to hire this attorney!
How do we go about to raise the money needed to pay him? He has to eat too!
Perhaps as an advisor to Attorney Taitz...and Orsi!
“Zero’s father was not a citizen of the U.S. at any time. Zero is therefore not a “natural born” citizen. “
Legal evidence supporting your idea of what natural born citizen means?
Like it or not, the very document you site grants the Federal Government to enact laws. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18.
It is up to the Supreme Court to decide whether or not a law is unconstitutional or not.
Indeed.
Thanks.
Make her travel before his birth even more important...
"The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
Chief Justice Morrison Waite, from Minor v. Happersett, cited by Justice Horace Gray as the meaning of natural born citizenship in United States v Wong Kim Ark
I doubt that. Canada? Possibly.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1405.html
And: Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 Again, the question is if he was born in Hawaii and if his mother was in the US for the required amount of time before his birth."
Federal code can not define who a "natural born Citizen" is. If it could, the definition could change of the whim of any congress and actually did in 1790 and 1795. The congress tried it once (extending the known natural law definition) and realized they didn't have the authority to do so. So, the repealed themselves.
Furthermore, just where, in that federal statue (which is found within TITLE 8—ALIENS AND NATIONALITY), is natural born Citizen defined?
It isn't. It only defines who may be a "citizen" if they are born in Hawaii. Fine. Barry is eligibile to be a Senator, a Rep (or state govt official). As Commander in Chief, he is required to be a "natural born Citizen." A higher standard.
| Office | Citizenship | Age | Residency (or years citizen) |
| Commander in Chief | natural born Citizen | 35 | 14 years resident |
| Senator | Citizen | 30 | 9 years a Citizen |
| Represantative | Citizen | 25 | 7 years a Citizen |
Yep. The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 determines his status.
The U.S. Immigration Law that covers the issue of children born abroad to 1 citizen and 1 alien.
http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmigration/66%20stat%20163.pdf
The McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
Public law 82-414 Chapter 1 Section 301 (7)
This applies to Obozo, assuming he is the son of Barrack H. Obama, Sr. and that he was born abroad.
If born abroad with the stated father, he is not even a U.S. Citizen.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.