Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Obama an Indonesian citizen? [Evidence raises concerns over presidential qualification]
WND ^ | May 08, 2011 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 05/09/2011 8:35:43 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Evidence continues to mount that President Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, raising concerns over his presidential eligibility.

Obama's American mother, Ann Dunham, separated from her first husband, Barack Obama Sr., in 1963 when the president was 2 years old. Dunham and Obama Sr. are reported to have later divorced.

In Hawaii, Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian, in 1965 and moved to Indonesia in October 1967.

Divorce documents filed in Hawaii on Aug. 20, 1980, refer to Obama as the "child" of both Soetoro and Dunham, indicating a possible adoption in the U.S.

Jerome Corsi’s new book, "Where’s the Birth Certificate?", is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore

The divorce records state: "The parties have 1 child(ren) below age 18 and 1 child(ren) above 18 but still dependent on the parties for education."

The records further identify the "oldest child" as "in university."

"Mother resides with youngest child in 4-bedroom house provided by mother's employer," continues the divorce documents.

The documents identify the minor as Obama's stepsister, Maya Soetoro.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; eligibility; giveitarest; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 661 next last
To: azishot

There is an inside story out there that the Joint Chief’s required Biden to sign the orders on the grounds that he is Acting President under the 20th Amendment.

Just catching up and this is a “WOW!” statement.


Lakin to be exonerated??? How can any military personnel in the know on this stay silent?


461 posted on 05/11/2011 1:25:27 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Jim Noble said: There has never been a time - not one single day - between 1947 and 2011 - that a US passport was not valid for travel to Pakistan. Travel by US citizens to Pakistan has never been restricted - not for one single day - by the Government of Pakistan OR by the United States.

Cut it out.
329 posted on 2011-05-11 09:19 by Jim Noble

You allmendream to the above comment:

2011-05-11 10:21 · 334 of 461
allmendream to Jim Noble
How DARE you!!!!

Nobody wants to hear your “facts” about there not being a Pakistan travel ban!

You 0-bot!

What kind of sinister motivation you must have, or they must be paying you to spread such loathsome TRUTH to those who would rather believe lies!

That prompted me to stick my nose in to show you that there was no ban. But you failed, but alluded to later, that that was sarc. Not everyone caught that and you have been combative throughout. Kinda made your own bed here....


462 posted on 05/11/2011 1:33:48 PM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

Good question. They’ll talk behind the scenes but not out in front?


463 posted on 05/11/2011 1:36:53 PM PDT by azishot (Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Exmil_UK
I have (you can check if so inclined) LONG supported legislative efforts to have the candidates State of birth send the form they say is proof of birth within that State directly to the Secretary of State before they can be put on the ballot for that State.

I am surprised that such has not been done before. That previously we were under the “honor code” for such things. I think that was and IS a terrible state of affairs!

What I opposed was the demand for a LONG FORM COLB - as such would run afoul of the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution - and I couldn't see how “swinging for the fences” trying to get at the Long Form was superior to a clearly Constitutional request for the “official” document to be sent from the DOH of one State to the SOS of another State.

So..... what would be wrong with having a law asking for the “official” (Hawaii says their official COLB is the short form) COLB being sent directly from the DOH of the State of birth to the SOS of the State they want on the ballot for?

Would this not be a reasonable law? Why do you suppose I got so much flak from birthers for daring to suggest it?

464 posted on 05/11/2011 1:38:21 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: danamco

“Sven we still need to know how and when he was issued a Social Security Number that previous had been issued to another person in CT???”

In my opinion, the 042 SSN used by Obama has been the only SSN he has used and has never been used by anyone else.

I am aware of private investigators and their research on the 042 number. In my opinion, its a misdirection to keep people from finding the truth.

The truth is that Obama’s SSN was applied for on his behalf by a refugee sponsor located in CT.


465 posted on 05/11/2011 1:39:08 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen (BHO II naturalized as U.S. Citizen after becoming an Indonesian National)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
Sorry - I thought the sarcasm was obvious. Thus the transposition of “truth” and “lies” regarding “Nobody wants to hear your TRUTH”.

The birthers seemed to catch what I was getting at.

I was a bit confused because of you thinking you needed to show ME that there was no ban.

Why else do you think I would refer to the fact that there was no ban as a “TRUTH” that they didn't want to hear.

Sorry for the “friendly fire”. I have found this thread quite enlightening and VERY amusing. Sorry if you found it less so.

466 posted on 05/11/2011 1:42:54 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: azishot

Why would you think this statement is true?


467 posted on 05/11/2011 1:45:13 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: David; Bikkuri; GregNH; Fantasywriter; warsaw44; ColdOne; wintertime; Fred Nerks; null and void; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The release this morning of the claim letter from the 0sama Bin Laden heirs may well operate to bring the issue back to the table.

International Law requires that to avoid prosecution and Criminal Liability, the Seals who carried out the mission were required to have been acting on lawful orders and were further obligated, as were their superior officers, to challenge orders which were not lawful.

Lawful orders among other things require issue by the Commander in Chief.

So if these guys were relying on orders from 0bama and he is not a NBC, the orders were not lawful and they have a criminal murder problem (maybe).

There is an inside story out there that the Joint Chief's required Biden to sign the orders on the grounds that he is Acting President under the 20th Amendment.

. . . . Excerpted. - Read more at # 449.

Thanks, David.

468 posted on 05/11/2011 1:49:22 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
Keep on writing your nonsense with nothing to back it up.

LOL. You're the one making claims and not backing them up. I'm simply pointing out that there is no basis for the things you say.

469 posted on 05/11/2011 1:54:17 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
So you admit that they couldn't have been divorced if they were never married.

Yes! That's my point!

Come back when you find proof of a marriage.

If they couldn't have been divorced without being married, then the fact that they were divorced proves they were married. Duh.

470 posted on 05/11/2011 1:56:22 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

No offense taken once I realized what was going on. Apology gracefully accepted.


471 posted on 05/11/2011 2:04:14 PM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
You're the one making claims and not backing them up.

Keep lying, 0bot troll.

You have nothing.
472 posted on 05/11/2011 2:04:21 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

Why would you think this statement is false?


473 posted on 05/11/2011 2:12:14 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 467 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
“No, the fraudulent LFBC didn’t answer any of those legitimate questions.”

Neither would a genuine LFBC answer any of those questions.

The focus the ‘brilliant’ leaders of the movement was “Where is the Birth Certificate?”.

Are you willing to admit that this was a mistake?

Or would such an admission taste too much of crow?"

What are you talking about? The natural born Citizen issue has been my #1 focus all along.

However, without a genuine LFBC and legitimate marriage records of his parents, we can't say for sure who his legal father (or mother) was.

474 posted on 05/11/2011 2:24:34 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

I have a question for whomever is moderating this thread: Would the repeated use of ‘taste too much of crow’ constitute agitprop work seeking to elicit a nasty response? Or does it matter anymore?


475 posted on 05/11/2011 2:38:47 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; David

They all want to devise their covers for when axes fall.

We all know a lot. Imagine what they know.


476 posted on 05/11/2011 2:46:22 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Keep the 'ICk" in Democratic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

So, being a witness is irrelevant?


477 posted on 05/11/2011 2:54:01 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Please tell us how an individual you think was born an American Citizen, gave up his citizenship then became a refugee to the US could accomplish this.what possible reason could he use to be a refugee?


478 posted on 05/11/2011 3:04:19 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: edge919

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2717548/posts?page=280#280

Read the MEMO


479 posted on 05/11/2011 3:13:22 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: HollyB
So, being a witness is irrelevant?

There is not a single whitness who claims Obama was born in Kenya.

480 posted on 05/11/2011 3:17:11 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 661 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson