I’m pretty sure that is the same argument that you used when you were pushing the liberal Trey Grayson against Rand Paul for that Senate seat.
” I’m pretty sure that is the same argument that you used when you were pushing the liberal Trey Grayson against Rand Paul for that Senate seat. ‘ ===============
What nerve. Your handle is fitting. You really are ancillary to any arguement, by more than 112 degrees, so long as it’s grounded in the tyranny of idealogical purity. Flailing away with accusations, name calling and manufactured imaginations that defy reality is so unattractive. Do you even vote? Or do you just run your high horse right past the ballot booth in a cloud of dust?
First, Paul performed so poorly in the weeks immediately after his primary win, his lead dropped to double-digits. Then, he maintained virtual radio silence for the rest of the campaign. That was a smart move.
But, am I surprised that a Republican won a Senate Seat being vacated by a Republican in a Republican state in an overwhelming Republican in a mid-term election? No, I am not surprised. And, I think Paul has done well in his first few months.
I realize you probably aren't smart enough to understand this, but the US is not Kentucky. Barack Obama is not an inexperienced opponent, and Sarah Palin is wildly unpopular and doesn't come ANYWHERE close to leading Obama in head-to-head matchups, let alone leading by 25% like Paul did before his primary.
But sure, if you want to continue your straw man arguments, please, don't let me stop you. You're entertaining me - it's like watching monkeys throw feces at one another.