Posted on 05/03/2011 6:54:16 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
Whatever else you think of Sarah Palin, she has, since the 2008 presidential campaign, been a clear voice in favor of a robust American presence in the world, a defender of the Afghanistan war, a friend of Israel and a counterweight to neo-isolationist elements on the right.
But careful observers of Palin noticed that recently she was sounding more like Obamas liberal critics than the VP candidate who echoed Sen. John McCains forward-leaning foreign policy. She put out a statement on Facebook last week on Libya that can only be described as incoherent. It was hard to tell if she wanted more or less American firepower in Libya. (At this point, to avoid further mission creep and involvement in a third war one we certainly cant afford you need to step up and justify our Libyan involvement, or Americans are going to demand you pull out. Simply put, what are we doing there?) Was she for or against a war to remove the Libyan dictator?
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Uh.........you do know that Sarah went to India a few months ago and said basically what you said in a interview over there?
You forgot to Barf-Alert this bad Washington Post article......LOL
Thanks, Folks!
I’ll have to find that speech.
The entire speech is written here on Palin’s PAC
http://sarahpac.com/posts/tribute-to-the-troops-with-governor-palin
Oh my bad! I thought you meant her speech last night, you meant the hong kong speech and the interview in India! I’ll get that to you as soon as possible
here you go:
http://conservatives4palin.com/2011/03/governor-palins-speech-at-the-india-today-conclave.html
Rubin is reading FAR too much into the simple statements Palin made. Palin wasn’t commenting on her support for military action one way or the other — she was commenting on Obama’s lack of clearly articulating why *HE* was committing troops and assets in Libya. Nothing more or less.
Thanks!
But Hussein Al Amriki and MB sleeper cell in DoS are not losing their resolve to establish Caliphate.
They removed Robert Gates as an obstacle.
np
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.