Let’s suppose a few things, and see where our mind goes:
1) Suppose it is a forgery
2) Suppose that only the layers identified so far are the variances from an original document that were chosen for forgery.
3) Suppose that the main body of the document in white is the non-forged bit.
4) What important components vary, then, that could be forged?
Answer:
1) Doctor’s signature.
2) The last numeral in the File Number.
3) Dates accepted by the two Registrars.
4) The certification of the copy.
5) The signature of the Local Registrar.
6) A couple of white boxes that may have been placed over the top of compromising information.
Question: Are any of those potentially manipulated components of the file sufficient to cause the reader to envision forgery?
Answer: Sure.
1) At a minimum, who the doctor was that delivered 0bama has always been in question. Now, we have a composite document that calls into question the signature of any doctor.
2) What dates the Registrars attested to is now in question.
3) Who the Local Regitrar was is now in question. Is the person alive, dead, talking, real, etc?
I don’t have time to continue this line of thinking. Back to work.
Y’all keep it up!
In post 47 scroll over to the right to the green one you can see markings that say “add” and markings like this / on the side.
There is no other reason that these things would be in the layer than it was created.