Birthers everywhere will be celebrating.
Why? This was the most important issue to birthers and now it is over. They wanted this issue for 2012 and now it is not going to be. I believe some birthers are very upset over this.
Does it prove he is a natural born citizen? Obviously his father was not a U.S. citizen. What were the rules at that time regarding one parent being a citizen?
Did you have an opinion of the subject of the OP?
(what was this sideshow today, designed to distract from?)
Meanwhile, how about all those other things Obama has been hiding?...
Not quite. If mommy and daddy were married, he isn't a Natural Born Citizen. Note, please, that I did not say he might not be a citizen, just not a Natural Born Citizen.
It seems so many people have just skimmed the issues surrounding the extensive lack of documentation of Mr. Obama, and this is far from the end: it is just the beginning.
Nice border treatments on that supposed document, too.
That’s why I wrote: “Birthers everywhere will be celebrating… then wondering what to do with the rest of their lives.”
At first they will celebrate, thinking they’ve actually accomplished something (Sorry, folks, but the original “certificate of live birth” Obama used was perfectly legal).
But sudddenly they will realize that they no longer have an issue... worse yet, they will discover their biggest supporter turned out to be Donald Trump. Some days just suck, don’t they?
You can check back on my posts and see that I've said the BC issue was a red herring all along.
His father was British! It's called dual citizenship!
This was always the smokescreen the MSM (including FOX News) and Obama supporters used to deflect from the natural born Citizen issue.
Why did the Founding Fathers change the original presidential eligibility requirement (proposed by Alexander Hamilton) from "born a Citizen" to John Jay's stricter language of "No person except a natural born Citizen"?