I'm nearly as old as zerØ, and mine looks like a page from the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Note how bnoth documents have the same flaw in the Race category.
Since when was someone’s race “African” as opposed to “Negro”, which was the typical entry for folks born during that time frame.
Until it undergoes some kind of forensic analysis, it’s just another scanned image.
But more to the point, it still fails to address the Natonality of the Father, per Article II, Section I
Digital copy reprinted on clean paper. I’ll accept it.
Now the questions are:
Does paternal non-citizenship disqualify?
Why so long to release something so simple and non-controversial?
Why now?
That’s what I thought when I first saw it, then I saw where it says (at the bottom) that it’s a “True Copy.” I’m not sure what, exactly, that means.
If it’s a newly printed copy, that MIGHT explain the newness and crispness of the paper. But then how did they get the original signatures printed on the new form? I want to believe this is a legitimate document, but there may be some who notice the crispness of this paper which is allgedly 50 years old. Stay tuned... birthers may not be ready to let this go yet.