Obama told us he is a native-born citizen, a 14th Amendment citizen, not a natural born citizen. No where in the 14th Amendment will you find the term, natural-born citizen. It is from our common-law, and is used in our Constitution and in about a dozen supreme court cases. It comes from 'natural-law' - the notion that a child is presumed to inherit the allegiance of his parents. That clarity is being obscured by the WND. It distracts citizens from the truth. Note that Obots, whether from WND or not, do not, and can not argue that truth. WND and its followers simply issue a dozen allegations each day about birth certificates, or alternative fathers, or rumors from Kenya. They sell lots of books.
If the courts won't honor the truth of Obama’s unconstitutionality, of what use are the tabloid-like guesses of alternative birth scenarios? They are of use - to Obama supporters, to stall for more time to complete the destruction of our economy, so that when the civil strife descends, as in Egypt, the best organized group in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood, the group which controls our military and justice department will take charge. Obama is Constitutionally ineligible. He told us that, but depends upon fear and ignorance to obscure that truth.
Nope. Common law is jus solis, place of birth.
Whether the jus sanguuinis, heredity, is natural law is debatable, but it is most certainly not common law.