This claim of yours is based on a hearsay story based on decades old memory. You have excluded the obvious possibility that Madelyn may have wanted to hid from relatives the fact that her daughter had a mixed-race child.
Goeldners shows up in HI for vacation from back home. Maybe Madelyn wasn't that close to Goeldner and wasn't willing, as a “typical white woman” to admit to her daughter's indiscretion, a daughter who was conveniently out the the country a lot.
You have not shared any corroborated evidence that any other person than Stanley Ann was the mother of BHO II.
This memory of Virginia Goeldner has zero evidentiary value from an investigative standpoint and would not be admissible in any court.
You have excluded the obvious possibility that Madelyn may have wanted to hid from relatives the fact that her daughter had a mixed-race child.
______________________________________________
Well its odd that Madelyn hade no qualms of letting everyone in the islands know that fact...
She put it into TWO big Hawaii newspapers...
also that her daughter had a black husband...
funny actions for a woman you seem to be claiming was a bigot...
Nothing about Zero has been admitted in any court. Yet.
And doesn't investigating mean following leads? Not rejecting everything or anything that isn't iron clad evidence that will be useful in court. I've been on enough grand juries to know that not everything that is useful in an investigation can be used as evidence in court. There's a lot of background investigating that has to be done to find such evidence.