Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativebuckeye
"Who could possibly get better ratings in that slot than Beck."

From FNC's business perspective, it's not about getting better ratings than Beck, it's entirely about generating more ad-revenue than Beck. Given Beck's ad-revenue, that will be very, very easy.

"John Gibson couldn’t do it and Laura Ingraham completely bombed in that slot."

I don't know about Ingraham, after all she wasn't on very long, but Gibson handily beat his competition in that time-slot, every day. Ultimately, that's all FNC cares about. But, it does them no good to whoop their competition while at the same time only be able to secure advertisers such as Pet-Meds and Goldline. They need to be able to appeal to the name brand companies that are willing to let go of the big ad dollar.

80 posted on 04/12/2011 6:38:32 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

I understand that another host that’s more vanilla will most likely generate more advertising revenue, but you indicate they will get the same ratings as Beck and I don’t agree. If they were so pleased with Gibson and Ingraham, they’d still be in that slot.


81 posted on 04/12/2011 12:34:00 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson