Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: OldDeckHand

I understand that another host that’s more vanilla will most likely generate more advertising revenue, but you indicate they will get the same ratings as Beck and I don’t agree. If they were so pleased with Gibson and Ingraham, they’d still be in that slot.


81 posted on 04/12/2011 12:34:00 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: conservativebuckeye
"If they were so pleased with Gibson and Ingraham, they’d still be in that slot."

First, I said they (whomever replaces Beck) will get about the same ratings. Look at Beck's most recent ratings. He barely outperforms Bret Baeir and Cavuto. His replacement may suffer some, but I rather doubt that Beck's ratings will be halved, or worse - which is what it would take for FNC to not win the time-slot.

As for Gibson, he wasn't fired. He did not want to continue his daily television show anymore and do his radio show too. So, he picked the radio show. FNC was happy with his ratings, as he always comfortably won that time slot.

I have no idea how Ingraham did in the ratings. She was only in that slot for a trial period, and she just didn't do very well in that kind of role.

82 posted on 04/12/2011 12:45:39 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson